• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

魁北克成年人群体中不坚持抗抑郁药物治疗的经济影响:一种比较成本效益的方法。

Economic impact of nonpersistence with antidepressant treatment in the adult population of Quebec: a comparative cost-effectiveness approach.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.015. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.015
PMID:21669374
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although for the great majority of indications, practice guidelines recommend that antidepressants (ADs) be used for at least 6 months, premature discontinuation is very frequent in a "real-life" setting. Previous studies have assessed the economic impact of such nonpersistence, but differences across antidepressant products remain inadequately explored.

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment persistence and incremental cost/persistence ratios (ICPRs) across individual new ADs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and atypical ADs) as well as the associated direct health-care costs in the adult population covered by the public drug program of Quebec.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 13,936 adults aged 18 to 64 years who started an AD treatment in 2003. Persistence was defined as treatment duration of at least 6 months regardless of whether a product switch had occurred. Economic impact was assessed over the first year of treatment through drug, medical services, hospitalization, and total health-care costs. Comparisons across products were conducted using the ICPR.

RESULTS

Adjusting for confounders, treatment nonpersistence ranged from 60.4% (paroxetine) to 65.1% (citalopram). The product associated with the highest total health-care costs was citalopram (CDN$2653) and the lowest was venlafaxine (CDN$2168). Fluvoxamine had the lowest mean AD costs (CDN$215) and venlafaxine (CDN$309) the highest.

CONCLUSIONS

Total health-care costs were similar across products except for citalopram, which was more costly. Comparisons based on the ICPR revealed that paroxetine, fluoxetine, and venlafaxine were more favorable than the other AD alternatives.

摘要

背景

尽管对于绝大多数适应证,实践指南建议抗抑郁药(AD)的使用至少应持续 6 个月,但在“现实生活”环境中,过早停药非常常见。先前的研究已经评估了这种不持续治疗的经济影响,但不同 AD 产品之间的差异仍未得到充分探讨。

目的

比较在魁北克公共药物计划覆盖的成年人群中,个体新型 AD(选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和非典型 AD)的治疗持续性和增量成本/持续性比(ICPR),以及相关的直接医疗保健成本。

方法

对 2003 年开始 AD 治疗的 13936 名 18 至 64 岁成年人进行了回顾性队列研究。无论是否发生产品转换,持续性定义为至少 6 个月的治疗时间。通过药物、医疗服务、住院和总医疗保健成本,在治疗的第一年评估经济影响。使用 ICPR 比较产品之间的差异。

结果

在调整混杂因素后,治疗不持续性范围从 60.4%(帕罗西汀)到 65.1%(西酞普兰)。总医疗保健成本最高的产品是西酞普兰(加元 2653 元),最低的是文拉法辛(加元 2168 元)。氟伏沙明的平均 AD 成本最低(加元 215 元),文拉法辛最高(加元 309 元)。

结论

除西酞普兰外,各产品的总医疗保健成本相似,西酞普兰的成本更高。基于 ICPR 的比较表明,帕罗西汀、氟西汀和文拉法辛比其他 AD 替代品更有利。

相似文献

1
Economic impact of nonpersistence with antidepressant treatment in the adult population of Quebec: a comparative cost-effectiveness approach.魁北克成年人群体中不坚持抗抑郁药物治疗的经济影响:一种比较成本效益的方法。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.015. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
2
Economic impact of non-persistence to antidepressant therapy in the Quebec community-dwelling elderly population.魁北克社区居住老年人群中抗抑郁治疗不持续的经济影响。
J Affect Disord. 2009 May;115(1-2):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
3
Economic impact of antidepressant treatment duration in naturalistic conditions.抗抑郁药治疗持续时间在自然条件下的经济影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013 May;127(5):365-72. doi: 10.1111/acps.12035. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness of usual general practitioner care with or without antidepressant medication for patients with minor or mild-major depression.普通全科医生对轻度或轻-重度抑郁症患者进行常规护理(无论是否使用抗抑郁药物)的成本效益。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Nov;111(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
5
A pharmacoeconomic study of the management of major depression: patients in a TennCare HMO.一项关于重度抑郁症治疗的药物经济学研究:田纳西医疗保健组织(TennCare HMO)中的患者
Med Interface. 1996 Jul;9(7):88-92.
6
A cost-effectiveness model of escitalopram, citalopram,and venlafaxine as first-line treatment for major depressive disorder in Belgium.艾司西酞普兰、西酞普兰和文拉法辛作为比利时重度抑郁症一线治疗药物的成本效益模型。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jan;27(1):111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.01.001.
7
Depression, health-related quality of life, and medical cost outcomes of receiving recommended levels of antidepressant treatment.接受推荐剂量抗抑郁治疗的抑郁症、健康相关生活质量及医疗费用结果
J Fam Pract. 1998 Dec;47(6):446-52.
8
Are psychological treatments for depression in primary care cost-effective?初级保健中抑郁症的心理治疗是否具有成本效益?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Mar;11(1):3-15.
9
[Antidepressants consumption in the global population in France].[法国全球人口中的抗抑郁药消费情况]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):411-7.
10
Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment among people with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者中系统性抑郁症治疗的成本效益
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;64(1):65-72. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.65.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs associated with depression and obesity among cardiovascular patients: medical expenditure panel survey analysis.心血管病患者的抑郁和肥胖相关成本:医疗支出面板调查分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 6;21(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06428-x.
2
Generic escitalopram initiation and substitution among Medicare beneficiaries: A new user cohort study.在医疗保险受益人群中起始使用通用艾司西酞普兰及替代治疗:一项新的使用者队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232226. eCollection 2020.
3
A review of antidepressant therapy in primary care: current practices and future directions.
基层医疗中抗抑郁治疗的综述:当前实践与未来方向
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.12r01420. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
4
Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.患者对精神障碍心理治疗与药物治疗的偏好:荟萃分析综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):595-602. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07757.