Education & Research, Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ann Hematol. 2011 Oct;90(10):1191-200. doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1267-3. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
This study aimed to determine whether progress in developing bleeding risk estimation tools for patients on oral anticoagulant therapy has been made since 2006 when we last systematically reviewed this topic, and to refresh previously published quantitative evaluations of the clinical prediction rules (CPRs) available for estimating bleeding risk in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy. A systematic review of English language literature published since December 2006 was conducted when our previous systematic review ended. Studies were analyzed for predictive performance using likelihood ratios. Six studies detailed CPRs used to assess risk of bleeding prior to commencing warfarin therapy, four of which were included in the analysis. Three studies evaluated new CPRs ("RIETE" and "HAS-BLED"). One of the studies was a further validation of the modified outpatient bleeding risk index (mOBRI) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Individual trial and pooled analyses using likelihood ratios for mOBRI and HAS-BLED showed they have weak predictive accuracy. A RIETE score of 0 point was moderately predictive of the absence of major bleeding. None of the CPRs exhibited sufficient predictive accuracy or had sufficient validation to be recommended for routine use in practice. None of the available CPRs exhibit sufficient predictive accuracy or have trials evaluating the impact of their use on patient outcomes. Hence, no existing oral anticoagulation major bleeding CPR can be recommended for routine use in practice at present.
本研究旨在确定自 2006 年我们上次系统综述该主题以来,在开发口服抗凝治疗患者出血风险评估工具方面是否取得了进展,并更新之前发表的用于评估口服抗凝治疗患者出血风险的临床预测规则(CPR)的定量评估。在我们上次系统综述结束时,对 2006 年 12 月以后发表的英文文献进行了系统评价。使用似然比分析研究的预测性能。有 6 项研究详细介绍了用于评估华法林治疗前出血风险的 CPR,其中 4 项被纳入分析。有 3 项研究评估了新的 CPR(“RIETE”和“HAS-BLED”)。其中一项研究进一步验证了房颤患者改良门诊出血风险指数(mOBRI)。使用似然比进行 mOBRI 和 HAS-BLED 的个体试验和汇总分析表明,它们的预测准确性较弱。RIETE 评分为 0 分可中度预测无大出血。没有任何 CPR 具有足够的预测准确性或经过充分验证,可推荐用于常规临床实践。现有的任何 CPR 都没有足够的预测准确性,也没有评估其使用对患者结局影响的临床试验。因此,目前没有现有的口服抗凝剂大出血 CPR 可推荐用于常规临床实践。