The University of Auckland, School of Nursing, Auckland, New Zealand.
Palliat Med. 2012 Apr;26(3):232-41. doi: 10.1177/0269216311408993. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
the right for patients of all diagnoses to be in receipt of palliative care from an early point in the diagnosis of a life-limiting condition is now enshrined in policy in a number of countries and increased emphasis is placed upon the role of generalist palliative care. However, little is known as to how this policy is enacted on the ground.
to explore understandings of, and perceived roles in relation to, palliative care provision amongst generalist and specialist health care providers in England and New Zealand.
qualitative data were collected via individual interviews and focus groups.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: participants comprised generalist and specialist palliative care providers working in a variety of settings in England (n = 58) and New Zealand (n = 80).
the following issues with significant implications for this new phase of development for palliative care were identified: (1) difficulties with terminology and perceived roles/responsibilities; (2) problems of integrating palliative care into a generalist workload; (3) challenges in generalist/specialist partnership working; and (4) the potential negative consequences of specialization.
these data indicate that, within England and New Zealand, the policy rhetoric of universal palliative care provision is not being straightforwardly translated into service delivery and individual clinical practice. Further research is required to explore and evaluate different models of organization and service provision that empower 'generalists' to provide palliative care, without resulting in deskilling. Finally, definitional clarity at an academic/policy level is also needed.
现在,许多国家的政策都规定,所有诊断出患有生命有限疾病的患者都应尽早接受姑息治疗,并更加重视全科姑息治疗的作用。然而,对于这项政策在实际中的实施情况,我们知之甚少。
探讨英国和新西兰的全科和专科医疗保健提供者对姑息治疗的理解以及他们在姑息治疗中的角色。
通过个人访谈和焦点小组收集定性数据。
地点/参与者:参与者包括在英国(n = 58)和新西兰(n = 80)各种环境中工作的全科和专科姑息治疗提供者。
确定了对姑息治疗新阶段发展具有重要意义的以下问题:(1)术语和感知角色/责任方面的困难;(2)将姑息治疗纳入全科工作量的问题;(3)全科/专科合作工作中的挑战;(4)专业化的潜在负面影响。
这些数据表明,在英国和新西兰,普及姑息治疗的政策言论并没有直接转化为服务提供和个人临床实践。需要进一步研究探索和评估不同的组织和服务提供模式,以使“全科医生”能够提供姑息治疗,而不会导致技能下降。最后,还需要在学术/政策层面上明确界定。