• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏病学家系统评价和荟萃分析基础。

Basics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the nephrologist.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;119(1):c50-60; discussion c61. doi: 10.1159/000324432. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1159/000324432
PMID:21677439
Abstract

Renal practitioners are expected to apply the best available evidence from rigorous scientific research to clinical decision-making and also for policy-making for those involved. Advances in information technology and unprecedented access to data have simplified the process for the search of best available evidence to guide practice. However, it is challenging to cope with the increasing volume of publications in nephrology and other areas of medicine. Accordingly, systematic reviews and meta-analysis have greatly facilitated best practice and effective clinical decision-making. Conducting a systematic review/meta-analysis involves a number of steps that start with protocol development and research question formulation, design and study selection criteria, followed by retrieval of potentially relevant studies, selection of those studies to be included and evaluation of a study's risk of bias. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have both strengths and weaknesses. Many of the perceived limitations of meta-analysis are not inherent in the methodology, but actually represent deficits in the conduct or reporting of individual primary studies. With the continuous proliferation of published renal clinical studies, such publications will continue to be an important resource for clinicians and researchers in nephrology. It is therefore important for nephrologists to keep abreast of developments in this field, which requires some knowledge about how these studies are conducted, reported and how to appraise them for application to clinical practice or policy-making.

摘要

肾脏科医生在进行临床决策和制定政策时,需要将最优质的现有证据应用于实践。信息技术的进步和前所未有的数据获取方式,简化了寻找最佳证据以指导实践的过程。然而,面对肾脏病学和其他医学领域出版物数量的不断增加,这一过程颇具挑战性。因此,系统评价和荟萃分析极大地促进了最佳实践和有效的临床决策。进行系统评价/荟萃分析涉及多个步骤,首先是制定方案和研究问题的表述、设计和研究选择标准,然后检索可能相关的研究,选择要纳入的研究并评估研究的偏倚风险。系统评价和荟萃分析都有其优缺点。许多人认为荟萃分析存在局限性,但实际上这些局限性并非源于该方法本身,而是源于个别原始研究的实施或报告存在缺陷。随着已发表的肾脏临床研究不断增加,此类出版物将继续成为肾脏病学家和研究人员的重要资源。因此,肾脏科医生了解该领域的最新进展非常重要,这需要他们掌握这些研究的实施、报告方式,并了解如何将其应用于临床实践或决策制定。

相似文献

1
Basics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the nephrologist.肾脏病学家系统评价和荟萃分析基础。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;119(1):c50-60; discussion c61. doi: 10.1159/000324432. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation.循证毒理学:因果关系的综合框架。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 Apr;24(4):161-201. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht517oa.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review of evidence synthesis: Concepts, types and methods.证据综合的范围综述:概念、类型与方法
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0323555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323555. eCollection 2025.
2
Evidence-Based Decision-Making 2: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.循证决策 2:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:405-428. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_22.