Suppr超能文献

比较新型阴茎假体植入术长度测量技术与标准技术:结局与患者满意度。

Comparison of a new length measurement technique for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to standard techniques: outcomes and patient satisfaction.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Regional Urology, Shreveport, LA 71106, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2011 Sep;8(9):2640-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02340.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Within a study evaluating the redesigned AMS 700MS inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA), one site used new length measurement technique (NLMT), a more aggressive dilation and measurement of the corpora cavernosa on a stretched penis, to address penile shortening.

AIM

To compare cylinder size and patient satisfaction, between a NLMT and traditional sizing for IPP implantation.

METHODS

Fourteen men received IPPs using NLMT, and 55 with traditional sizing. Nationwide sales data from 2005 to 2008 for AMS 700 IPPs was obtained from AMS for comparison; additional surveys captured patient satisfaction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Demographic data, cylinder sizes, and patient satisfaction were compared between the NLMT and standard techniques.

RESULTS

The Fisher's exact test (P<0.001) showed a significant difference between the cylinder sizes with NLMT as compared with standard techniques. Of the 14 NLMT patients, 71.4% (10) received cylinders>21 cm long and 28.6% (4) received cylinders<21 cm long, as compared with 12.7% (7) and 87.3% (48), respectively, for patients implanted by traditional techniques. There were ethnic differences between the samples: 42.9% (6) NLMT patients were of African-American descent, as compared with 10.9% (6) in the standard technique group. However, longer cylinders were utilized more often, with 83.3% (5) of African-Americans treated using the NLMT; as compared with 33.3% (2) of the standard technique group. Nationwide data reveal 12.3% of patients routinely receive 21 cm cylinders. At 6 months postimplantation, patient satisfaction with NLMT was no different than standard techniques. There were no distal erosions, complications, infections, or pain concerns reported through 24 months among the NLMT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The NLMT resulted in a larger number of subjects implanted with larger cylinders. Satisfaction with performance and complication rates for NLMT patients was comparable to those implanted using standard techniques.

摘要

简介

在一项评估重新设计的 AMS 700MS 可充气阴茎假体(IPP)(美国医学系统,明尼苏达州明尼通卡)的研究中,一个研究地点使用了新的长度测量技术(NLMT),即在阴茎伸展时更积极地扩张和测量海绵体,以解决阴茎缩短的问题。

目的

比较 NLMT 与 IPP 植入的传统尺寸测量在阴茎假体大小和患者满意度方面的差异。

方法

14 名男性使用 NLMT 接受 IPP 植入,55 名男性使用传统方法。从 AMS 获得 2005 年至 2008 年 AMS 700 IPP 的全国销售数据进行比较;额外的调查获得了患者满意度。

主要观察指标

NLMT 与标准技术之间的人口统计学数据、阴茎假体大小和患者满意度进行比较。

结果

Fisher 精确检验(P<0.001)显示 NLMT 与标准技术之间的阴茎假体大小存在显著差异。在 14 名 NLMT 患者中,71.4%(10 名)接受的阴茎假体长度超过 21cm,28.6%(4 名)接受的阴茎假体长度小于 21cm,而传统技术组分别为 12.7%(7 名)和 87.3%(48 名)。样本之间存在种族差异:42.9%(6 名)NLMT 患者为非裔美国人,而标准技术组为 10.9%(6 名)。然而,使用 NLMT 的患者更常使用较长的阴茎假体,其中 83.3%(5 名)为非裔美国人;而标准技术组为 33.3%(2 名)。全国范围内的数据显示,12.3%的患者常规使用 21cm 阴茎假体。植入后 6 个月,NLMT 患者的满意度与标准技术组无差异。在 NLMT 患者中,通过 24 个月的随访,没有报告远端侵蚀、并发症、感染或疼痛问题。

结论

NLMT 导致更多的患者植入更大的阴茎假体。NLMT 患者的手术性能和并发症发生率的满意度与使用标准技术植入的患者相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验