• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后 3 件式可膨胀阴茎假体植入术:技术与结果。

3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.

机构信息

USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Tricounty Urology Associates, Washington, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014
PMID:29452979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After radical cystoprostatectomy (RC), postoperative erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common consequence with multiple contributing etiologies. The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) offers patients a definitive treatment option when ED is refractory to medical therapies. Because of the hostile postoperative anatomy of these patients, a careful surgical approach is necessary for successful outcomes and to avoid adjacent organ injury. To date, there is no series describing the outcomes of 3-piece IPP placement in patients with urinary diversions.

AIM

To present contemporary outcomes and a description of our technique in placing a 3-piece IPP for postoperative ED in patients with a history of RC with orthotopic neobladder, ileal conduit, or continent cutaneous diversion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 80 patients who underwent primary placement of a 3-piece IPP (AMS 700; American Medical Systems Inc, Minnetonka, MN, USA) after RC and urinary diversion from 2003 through 2016. 79 patients underwent RC in their treatment of urologic malignancy (71 for bladder cancer, 8 for prostate cancer) and 1 underwent RC for refractory interstitial cystitis. An infrapubic approach was used in most patients, with reservoir placement in the lateral retroperitoneal space through a counterincision medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes including prosthetic infection and mechanical failure were examined and statistical analysis was performed.

OUTCOMES

Rates of device infection, revision surgery, and reservoir complications.

RESULTS

After mean follow-up of 53.9 months (6.5-150.7 months), 4 patients developed infection of the prosthesis that required explantation. 3 of those patients underwent successful IPP reimplantation. 5 patients required revision surgery (pump replacement, n = 3; pump relocation, n = 1; cylinder replacement for cylinder aneurysm, n = 1) for mechanical failure. No statistically significant associations were found between infection and comorbidities, urinary diversion, exposure to chemotherapy, radiation, or presence of an artificial urinary sphincter.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The 3-piece IPP is an effective treatment option for medication-refractory ED that can be placed safely in patients with all forms of urinary diversion.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This study represents the 1st series that describes a successful technique and long-term outcomes of patients with urinary diversion. It is limited by its single-surgeon, single-center experience and lacks validated patient satisfaction data in follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-piece IPP, with reservoir placement in the lateral retroperitoneum, can be implanted successfully in patients with all forms of urinary diversion without a significant increase in infectious complications, reservoir erosion, or mechanical failure. Loh-Doyle J, Patil MB, Sawkar H, et al. 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes. J Sex Med 2018;15:907-913.

摘要

背景

根治性膀胱前列腺切除术(RC)后,术后勃起功能障碍(ED)是一种常见的后果,有多种病因。当 ED 对药物治疗无反应时,可充气阴茎假体(IPP)为患者提供了一种明确的治疗选择。由于这些患者术后解剖结构恶劣,需要谨慎的手术方法才能获得成功的结果,并避免邻近器官损伤。迄今为止,尚无关于在接受 RC 后有尿流改道术史的患者中放置 3 件式 IPP 的结果的系列描述。

目的

介绍我们在 RC 后有原位新膀胱、回肠导管或经皮可控尿流改道术史的患者中,使用 3 件式 IPP 治疗术后 ED 的当代结果和技术描述。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2003 年至 2016 年间接受 AMS 700(美国医疗系统公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市)3 件式 IPP 初次植入的 80 例患者的资料,这些患者均因 RC 和尿流改道而接受治疗。79 例患者因泌尿系统恶性肿瘤(膀胱癌 71 例,前列腺癌 8 例)而接受 RC,1 例因难治性间质性膀胱炎而接受 RC。大多数患者采用耻骨下入路,通过髂前上棘前侧的反切口将储尿器置于侧腹膜后。检查围手术期数据和术后结果,包括假体感染和机械故障,并进行统计学分析。

结果

平均随访 53.9 个月(6.5-150.7 个月)后,4 例患者发生假体感染,需要取出。其中 3 例患者成功接受了 IPP 再植入。5 例患者需要进行翻修手术(泵置换 3 例,泵移位 1 例,因圆柱动脉瘤更换圆柱 1 例)以解决机械故障。感染与合并症、尿流改道、化疗、放疗暴露或人工尿道括约肌的存在之间无统计学显著关联。

结论

3 件式 IPP 是治疗药物难治性 ED 的有效方法,可安全地应用于各种形式的尿流改道患者。

局限性

本研究是首例描述有尿流改道术史的患者成功技术和长期结果的系列研究。其受到单外科医生、单中心经验的限制,缺乏随访时经证实的患者满意度数据。

结论

3 件式 IPP,将储尿器置于侧腹膜后,可以成功植入各种形式的尿流改道患者,不会显著增加感染并发症、储尿器侵蚀或机械故障。

相似文献

1
3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后 3 件式可膨胀阴茎假体植入术:技术与结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
2
Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Pelvic Radiation: Technical Considerations and Contemporary Outcomes.三件式可充气阴茎假体植入术后盆腔放疗:技术考虑和当代结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jul;15(7):1049-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.634. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Dual Prosthetic Implantation After Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Neobladder: Outcomes of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Bladder Cancer Survivors.根治性膀胱前列腺切除术后及新膀胱的双假体植入:膀胱癌幸存者中可膨胀阴茎假体和人工尿道括约肌的效果
Urology. 2019 May;127:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Preperitoneal placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir for postoperative erectile dysfunction after radical cystoprostatectomy with orthotopic neobladder.根治性膀胱切除术+原位新膀胱术后并发勃起功能障碍患者的可膨胀阴茎假体储液器腹膜前放置。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Sep;57(5):364-6. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.364. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
5
Erosion of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into neobladder.可膨胀阴茎假体储液器侵蚀新膀胱。
J Sex Med. 2013 Sep;10(9):2343-6. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12239. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
6
A purely penoscrotal approach: Reservoir placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) in an orthotopic neobladder patient. Case report.一种单纯的阴茎阴囊入路:在原位新膀胱患者中植入可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)的贮液器。病例报告。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Oct 2;91(3). doi: 10.4081/aiua.2019.3.191.
7
An outcomes analysis of penile prosthesis implantation following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a multicentric retrospective cohort study.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后阴茎假体植入的结果分析:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jan;32(1):126-132. doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0171-6. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
8
Ambicor Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Background and Contemporary Outcomes.安必科双件可充胀型阴茎假体:背景与当代疗效。
Sex Med Rev. 2018 Apr;6(2):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
9
Preliminary Outcomes of the Male Urethral "Mini-Sling": A Modified Approach to the Andrianne Mini-Jupette Procedure With Penile Prosthesis Placement for Climacturia and Mild Stress Urinary Incontinence.男性尿道“迷你吊带”的初步结果:一种改良的 Andrianne 迷你-Jupette 手术方法,结合阴茎假体植入治疗绝经后女性的尿失禁和轻度压力性尿失禁。
J Sex Med. 2019 Aug;16(8):1310-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Ambicor 2-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Who and How?安必可 2 件式可充气阴茎假体:适用人群和操作方法?
J Sex Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal rate and mechanical failure in penile prosthesis implantation: A systematic review.阴茎假体植入的移除率和机械故障:一项系统评价。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01165-9.
2
Reservoir migration in inflatable penile prostheses: a systematic review and development of a clinical decision algorithm.可膨胀阴茎假体中的储液囊移位:一项系统评价及临床决策算法的制定
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01139-x.
3
Reservoir placement options: a state of the art review.储库放置选项:最新综述
Int J Impot Res. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01082-x.
4
MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.阴茎病变与假体的磁共振成像
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04417-2. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
5
Management of the anatomically complex penile implant candidate through an infrapubic incision: a review of surgical techniques and benefits.经耻骨下切口对解剖结构复杂的阴茎假体植入候选者的管理:手术技术及益处综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):252-259. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-182. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Inflatable Penile Prostheses for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Evidence to Date.可膨胀阴茎假体治疗勃起功能障碍的安全性与有效性:迄今的证据
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Feb 10;15:27-36. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S251364. eCollection 2022.
7
Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature.阴茎植入物感染因素:当代文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Oct;10(10):3873-3884. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-568.
8
Robotic radical cystectomy with concomitant implantation of 3-piece penile prosthesis: a one-step solution.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合三件套阴茎假体植入:一站式解决方案。
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Jun 15;13:17562872211024512. doi: 10.1177/17562872211024512. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
9
Ten-year experience with penile prosthetic surgery for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: outcomes of a tertiary referral center and predictors of early prosthetic infection. penile 假体手术治疗勃起功能障碍的十年经验:三级转诊中心的结果和早期假体感染的预测因素。
Asian J Androl. 2022 Jan-Feb;24(1):32-39. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_27_21.
10
Effect of a three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis combined with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor on erectile dysfunction.三件套可膨胀阴茎假体联合磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂对勃起功能障碍的影响。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Apr;49(4):300060520985365. doi: 10.1177/0300060520985365.