• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术切缘阳性:多机构研究。

Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study.

机构信息

Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital-Celebration Health, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112
PMID:21680001
Abstract

PURPOSE

Positive surgical margins are an independent predictive factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We analyzed the incidence of and associative factors for positive surgical margins in a multi-institutional series of 8,418 robotic assisted radical prostatectomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the records of 8,418 patients who underwent robotic assisted radical prostatectomy at 7 institutions. Of the patients 323 had missing data on margin status. Positive surgical margins were categorized into 4 groups, including apex, bladder neck, posterolateral and multifocal. The records of 6,169 patients were available for multivariate analysis. The variables entered into the logistic regression models were age, body mass index, preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, prostate weight and pathological stage. A second model was built to identify predictive factors for positive surgical margins in the subset of patients with organ confined disease (pT2).

RESULTS

The overall positive surgical margin rate was 15.7% (1,272 of 8,095 patients). The positive surgical margin rate for pT2 and pT3 disease was 9.45% and 37.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological stage (pT2 vs pT3 OR 4.588, p<0.001) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (4 or less vs greater than 10 ng/ml OR 2.918, p<0.001) were the most important independent predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Increasing prostate weight was associated with a lower risk of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.984, p<0.001) and a higher body mass index was associated with a higher risk of positive surgical margins (OR 1.032, p<0.001). For organ confined disease preoperative prostate specific antigen was the most important factor that independently correlated with positive surgical margins (4 or less vs greater than 10 ng/ml OR 3.8, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prostatic apex followed by a posterolateral site was the most common location of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Factors that correlated with cancer aggressiveness, such as pathological stage and preoperative prostate specific antigen, were the most important factors independently associated with an increased risk of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

摘要

目的

阳性切缘是根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的独立预测因素。我们分析了 7 家机构 8418 例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的阳性切缘发生率及相关因素。

材料与方法

我们分析了 7 家机构 8418 例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的病历资料,其中 323 例患者的切缘状态数据缺失。阳性切缘分为 4 组,包括尖部、膀胱颈部、后外侧和多灶性。6169 例患者的病历资料可用于多变量分析。纳入逻辑回归模型的变量包括年龄、体重指数、术前前列腺特异性抗原、活检 Gleason 评分、前列腺重量和病理分期。建立第二个模型以确定局限于器官疾病(pT2)患者中阳性切缘的预测因素。

结果

总体阳性切缘率为 15.7%(8095 例患者中有 1272 例)。pT2 和 pT3 疾病的阳性切缘率分别为 9.45%和 37.2%。多变量分析显示,病理分期(pT2 与 pT3,OR 4.588,p<0.001)和术前前列腺特异性抗原(4 或以下与大于 10ng/ml,OR 2.918,p<0.001)是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘的最重要独立预测因素。前列腺重量增加与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘的风险降低相关(OR 0.984,p<0.001),而体重指数增加与阳性切缘的风险增加相关(OR 1.032,p<0.001)。对于局限于器官疾病,术前前列腺特异性抗原是与阳性切缘独立相关的最重要因素(4 或以下与大于 10ng/ml,OR 3.8,p<0.001)。

结论

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后,阳性切缘最常见于前列腺尖部和后外侧。与癌症侵袭性相关的因素,如病理分期和术前前列腺特异性抗原,是与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘风险增加相关的最重要的独立因素。

相似文献

1
Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术切缘阳性:多机构研究。
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
2
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.在已有的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术项目中增加机器人手术:对手术切缘阳性的影响。
Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.
4
Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性长度作为生化复发的预测指标。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139. Epub 2009 May 17.
5
Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术标本手术切缘良性腺体的临床意义
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.048.
6
Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes?机器人和腹腔镜前列腺切除术的边缘控制:真正的结果是什么?
Urol Oncol. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.08.009.
7
Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的手术切缘阳性:学习曲线对肿瘤学结局的影响。
Eur Urol. 2006 May;49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.054. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
8
Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:短期生化无复发生存率比较。
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
9
Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的预测因素及其部位。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
10
Re: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. A. Smith, Jr., R. C. Chan, S. S. Chang, S. D. Herrell, P. E. Clark, R. Baumgartner and M. S. Cookson. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2390.回复:机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。小J.A.史密斯、R.C.陈、S.S.张、S.D.赫雷尔、P.E.克拉克、R.鲍姆加特纳和M.S.库克森。《泌尿外科杂志》2007年;178卷:2385 - 2390页。
J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):410-1; author reply 411. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.067. Epub 2008 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single-surgeon series.150例后入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术早期疗效的比较分析及学习曲线的确定:单术者系列研究
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 23;6(7):e70058. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70058. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Analysis of risk factors for positive margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with Retzius-sparing (RS-RARP).保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术切缘阳性的危险因素分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 30;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03812-3.
3
Oncological and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing vs. standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: evidence on randomized-controlled trials studies.
保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学和功能学结果:随机对照试验研究证据
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 21;19(1):165. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02335-z.
4
Development of preoperative nomograms to predict the risk of overall and multifocal positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.术前列线图的开发,用于预测根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性及多灶性切缘阳性的风险。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w.
5
Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with Hugo™ RAS versus daVinci Surgical Platform: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis.使用Hugo™ RAS与达芬奇手术平台进行机器人根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结果:倾向评分匹配的比较分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 28;13(11):3157. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113157.
6
A comparative evaluation of radical prostatectomy using laparoscopic and open method in view of surgical margins.从手术切缘角度对腹腔镜和开放手术行根治性前列腺切除术的比较评估
Cent European J Urol. 2023;76(4):300-304. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.77. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
7
Outcomes of lateral approach in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: insights from a single-surgeon experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术侧入路的结果:单中心经验的见解。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 13;18(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01772-y.
8
Novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation and long-term outcomes for a single surgeon.单外科医生采用保留盆内筋膜的新型神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及长期疗效。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51598-3.
9
Clinical outcomes for men with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy-results from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative community-based registry.前列腺癌根治术后手术切缘阳性男性的临床结局——来自南澳大利亚前列腺癌临床结局协作组社区登记处的结果
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):502-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.肾移植受者的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 25;12(21):6754. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216754.