Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Jul 1;9(4):209-15. doi: 10.2165/11592960-000000000-00000.
Patient Access Schemes (PAS) are alternative market access agreements between the UK Department of Health and drug manufacturers. They are implemented to enable the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to recommend expensive medicines for use in the UK NHS.
We aimed to analyse the extent to which NICE drug appraisals influence the construction of PAS and what rationale underlies the variety of approaches to their design.
We analysed publicly available documentation on PAS developed as a part of the NICE Health Technology Assessment process.
We demonstrate how the design of PAS is determined by the kind of evidence that is available to model cost effectiveness of a drug and by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that is deemed acceptable in a given patient population. PAS aimed to reduce drug cost to the NHS by means of various discounts or rebates on a per-patient basis rather than by lowering the list price of drugs. While almost all schemes were proposed by the industry in reply to negative draft recommendations by NICE, motivations of the stakeholders to implement PAS are not disclosed in the publicly available documentation.
A more transparent process might be necessary to protect against a perverse impact of PAS on international reference pricing that uses list prices rather than the real cost of purchasing medicines that the NHS incurs.
患者准入方案(PAS)是英国卫生部与药品制造商之间的替代市场准入协议。它们的实施是为了使英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)能够推荐昂贵的药物在英国国民保健制度(NHS)中使用。
我们旨在分析 NICE 药物评估对 PAS 构建的影响程度,以及设计 PAS 的各种方法背后的基本原理。
我们分析了作为 NICE 健康技术评估过程一部分开发的 PAS 的公开可用文档。
我们展示了 PAS 的设计是如何由可用于模拟药物成本效益的证据种类以及在给定患者群体中被认为可接受的增量成本效益比决定的。PAS 旨在通过对每位患者的各种折扣或回扣来降低 NHS 的药品成本,而不是降低药品的标价。虽然几乎所有的方案都是制药行业为了回应 NICE 的负面草案建议而提出的,但在公开的文件中并未披露利益相关者实施 PAS 的动机。
为了防止 PAS 对使用标价而不是 NHS 实际购买药品成本的国际参考定价产生不利影响,可能需要一个更透明的过程。