• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国患者准入方案设计:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所卫生技术评估的影响。

Design of patient access schemes in the UK: influence of health technology assessment by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

机构信息

Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Jul 1;9(4):209-15. doi: 10.2165/11592960-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11592960-000000000-00000
PMID:21682349
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient Access Schemes (PAS) are alternative market access agreements between the UK Department of Health and drug manufacturers. They are implemented to enable the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to recommend expensive medicines for use in the UK NHS.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyse the extent to which NICE drug appraisals influence the construction of PAS and what rationale underlies the variety of approaches to their design.

METHODS

We analysed publicly available documentation on PAS developed as a part of the NICE Health Technology Assessment process.

RESULTS

We demonstrate how the design of PAS is determined by the kind of evidence that is available to model cost effectiveness of a drug and by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that is deemed acceptable in a given patient population. PAS aimed to reduce drug cost to the NHS by means of various discounts or rebates on a per-patient basis rather than by lowering the list price of drugs. While almost all schemes were proposed by the industry in reply to negative draft recommendations by NICE, motivations of the stakeholders to implement PAS are not disclosed in the publicly available documentation.

CONCLUSION

A more transparent process might be necessary to protect against a perverse impact of PAS on international reference pricing that uses list prices rather than the real cost of purchasing medicines that the NHS incurs.

摘要

背景

患者准入方案(PAS)是英国卫生部与药品制造商之间的替代市场准入协议。它们的实施是为了使英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)能够推荐昂贵的药物在英国国民保健制度(NHS)中使用。

目的

我们旨在分析 NICE 药物评估对 PAS 构建的影响程度,以及设计 PAS 的各种方法背后的基本原理。

方法

我们分析了作为 NICE 健康技术评估过程一部分开发的 PAS 的公开可用文档。

结果

我们展示了 PAS 的设计是如何由可用于模拟药物成本效益的证据种类以及在给定患者群体中被认为可接受的增量成本效益比决定的。PAS 旨在通过对每位患者的各种折扣或回扣来降低 NHS 的药品成本,而不是降低药品的标价。虽然几乎所有的方案都是制药行业为了回应 NICE 的负面草案建议而提出的,但在公开的文件中并未披露利益相关者实施 PAS 的动机。

结论

为了防止 PAS 对使用标价而不是 NHS 实际购买药品成本的国际参考定价产生不利影响,可能需要一个更透明的过程。

相似文献

1
Design of patient access schemes in the UK: influence of health technology assessment by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.英国患者准入方案设计:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所卫生技术评估的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Jul 1;9(4):209-15. doi: 10.2165/11592960-000000000-00000.
2
Value based pricing, research and development, and patient access schemes. Will the United Kingdom get it right or wrong?基于价值的定价、研究与开发以及患者准入方案。英国会做对还是做错?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;70(3):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03740.x.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
5
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Do generics offer significant savings to the UK National Health Service?仿制药能为英国国民医疗服务体系大幅节省开支吗?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jan;23(1):105-16. doi: 10.1185/030079907X159506.
7
NICE, in Confidence: An Assessment of Redaction to Obscure Confidential Information in Single Technology Appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.NICE(英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所):在保密中的评估——对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估中掩盖保密信息的做法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Nov;37(11):1383-1390. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00818-0.
8
Neuropsychotherapeutics in the UK: what has been the impact of NICE on prescribing?英国的神经心理治疗学:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)对处方有何影响?
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(1):1-12. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418010-00001.
9
Societal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain.英国成年人对 NICE、癌症药物基金以及基于价值的药物优先排序定价标准的看法:一项对 4118 名成年人的横断面调查。
Health Econ. 2013 Aug;22(8):948-64. doi: 10.1002/hec.2872. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
10
Market Access Agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts.欧洲药品市场准入协议:方法的多样性和基本概念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 8;11:259. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-259.

引用本文的文献

1
Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceutical Products in Three Maghreb Countries: Payer and Supplier Perspectives.马格里布三国药品的准入管理协议:支付方与供应商视角
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Aug 11;13(3):40. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13030040. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Barriers and Opportunities for Implementation of Outcome-Based Spread Payments for High-Cost, One-Shot Curative Therapies.高成本一次性治愈性疗法实施基于结果的推广支付的障碍与机遇
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 8;11:594446. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.594446. eCollection 2020.
3
The Implementation of Managed Entry Agreements in Central and Eastern Europe: Findings and Implications.
中东欧实施管理准入协议:发现与启示。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Dec;35(12):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0559-4.
4
Market Access Agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts.欧洲药品市场准入协议:方法的多样性和基本概念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 8;11:259. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-259.