• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罕见病药物:孤儿药认定状态对价格的影响。

Drugs for rare diseases: influence of orphan designation status on price.

机构信息

Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Jul 1;9(4):275-9. doi: 10.2165/11590170-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11590170-000000000-00000
PMID:21682354
Abstract

The literature indicates that the expenditure on orphan drugs will be increasing over the coming years. The market for orphan drugs has inherent market characteristics that sometimes result in high prices. The aim of this study was to analyse whether awarding orphan designation status has an influence on the price setting of drugs for rare disease indications. To this effect, prices of designated orphan drugs were compared with other non-designated drugs for rare disease indications. We identified 28 designated orphan drugs and 16 comparable non-designated drugs for rare disease indications for which we collected official hospital prices (per defined daily dose) in Belgium in 2010. Orphan-designated drugs had a higher median price (138.56 Euros [interquartile range; IQR 406.57 Euros]) than non-designated drugs (16.55 Euros [IQR 28.05 Euros]) for rare disease indications (p < 0.01). In conclusion, our results suggest that awarding orphan designation status in itself is associated with higher prices for drugs for rare disease indications. In order to gain full insight into orphan drug pricing mechanisms, future research should focus on collecting information about the different factors influencing orphan drug pricing.

摘要

文献表明,未来几年孤儿药的支出将会增加。孤儿药市场具有内在的市场特征,这有时会导致价格高昂。本研究旨在分析授予孤儿药认定地位是否会对罕见病适应证药物的定价产生影响。为此,我们比较了有认定地位的孤儿药和其他无认定地位的罕见病适应证药物的价格。我们确定了 28 种有认定地位的孤儿药和 16 种有认定地位的罕见病适应证药物,收集了 2010 年比利时官方医院(每规定日剂量)的价格。有认定地位的孤儿药(中位数 138.56 欧元[四分位间距:406.57 欧元])比无认定地位的孤儿药(中位数 16.55 欧元[四分位间距:28.05 欧元])价格更高(p<0.01)。总之,我们的结果表明,孤儿药认定地位的授予本身与罕见病适应证药物的高价有关。为了全面了解孤儿药定价机制,未来的研究应集中收集影响孤儿药定价的各种因素的信息。

相似文献

1
Drugs for rare diseases: influence of orphan designation status on price.罕见病药物:孤儿药认定状态对价格的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Jul 1;9(4):275-9. doi: 10.2165/11590170-000000000-00000.
2
Issues surrounding orphan disease and orphan drug policies in Europe.欧洲孤儿病和孤儿药政策相关问题。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(5):343-50. doi: 10.2165/11536990-000000000-00000.
3
Drugs for rare diseases: mixed assessment in Europe.罕见病药物:欧洲的综合评估
Prescrire Int. 2007 Feb;16(87):36-42.
4
Determinants of orphan drugs prices in France: a regression analysis.法国孤儿药价格的决定因素:一项回归分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Apr 21;12(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0561-5.
5
[Orphan drugs: availability, reliability and reimbursement].[罕见病药物:可及性、可靠性与报销]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(17):A4252.
6
The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?美国孤儿药法案:罕见病研究的刺激因素还是商业机会?
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
7
Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues.欧洲孤儿药的可及性:当前和未来的问题。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Feb;12(1):23-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.95.
8
Quantifying emerging drugs for very rare conditions.量化针对极为罕见病症的新兴药物。
QJM. 2007 May;100(5):291-5. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm021.
9
Optimal drug pricing, limited use conditions and stratified net benefits for Markov models of disease progression.疾病进展马尔可夫模型的最优药物定价、有限使用条件和分层净效益
Health Econ. 2008 Nov;17(11):1277-94. doi: 10.1002/hec.1332.
10
The challenges of orphan drugs and orphan diseases: real and imagined.孤儿药和孤儿病面临的挑战:真实与想象。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;92(2):151-3. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.72.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping challenges in the accessibility of treatment products for urea cycle disorders: A survey of European healthcare professionals.尿素循环障碍治疗产品可及性的映射挑战:一项针对欧洲医疗保健专业人员的调查
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2025 Jan;48(1):e12815. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12815. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Safety Profile of Monoclonal Antibodies and Subsequent Drug Developments in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿症治疗中单克隆抗体的安全性概况及后续药物研发。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 24;60(3):379. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030379.
3
The cancer premium - explaining differences in prices for cancer vs non-cancer drugs with efficacy and epidemiological endpoints in the US, Germany, and Switzerland: a cross sectional study.
癌症药物溢价——在美国、德国和瑞士,基于疗效和流行病学终点解释癌症药物与非癌症药物价格差异的横断面研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 13;61:102087. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102087. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Orphan Drugs, Compounded Medication and Pharmaceutical Commons.孤儿药、复方制剂与药学共享资源
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 10;12:738458. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.738458. eCollection 2021.
5
Dynamics of patents, orphan drug designation, licensing, and revenues from drugs for rare diseases: The market expansion of eculizumab.罕见病药物专利、孤儿药认定、授权及收益的动态变化:依库珠单抗的市场拓展
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0247853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247853. eCollection 2021.
6
Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.孤儿药的公共支出:文献综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 13;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00260-0. eCollection 2020.
7
An analysis of orphan medicine expenditure in Europe: is it sustainable?欧洲孤儿药支出分析:是否可持续?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Dec 11;14(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1246-7.
8
Do payers value rarity? An analysis of the relationship between disease rarity and orphan drug prices in Europe.支付方看重药物的罕见性吗?欧洲疾病罕见性与孤儿药价格之间关系的分析。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Apr 10;5(1):1299665. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1299665. eCollection 2017.
9
A comparative study of orphan drug prices in Europe.欧洲孤儿药价格的比较研究。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Mar 29;5(1):1297886. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1297886. eCollection 2017.
10
Gene therapies development: slow progress and promising prospect.基因疗法的发展:进展缓慢但前景广阔。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Jan 3;5(1):1265293. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1265293. eCollection 2017.