Young Katherine Eve, Soussi Imen, Hemels Michiel, Toumi Mondher
Pricing, Reimbursement, Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Pricing, Reimbursement, Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Mar 29;5(1):1297886. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1297886. eCollection 2017.
: This study assessed price differences by comparing annual treatment costs of similarly available orphan drugs in France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and UK. : Annual treatment costs per drug were calculated using ex-factory prices from IHS POLI and country price databases. The treatment cost in the comparator country was compared to the UK and ratios were analysed. Subanalyses were done on disease areas and UK cost quartiles. : 120 orphan drugs were included. Compared to the UK, the average costs were more expensive in France (1.13), Germany (1.11), Italy (1.08), Spain (1.07), and were cheaper in Sweden (0.99) and Norway (0.88). The average ratios offered a restrictive view as ratios were greatly heterogeneous (0.26 to 1.92) which was also seen in the different disease areas. The averaged ratios varied minimally among the cost quartiles which shows that cost differences were similar for the most expensive and least expensive orphan drugs in the UK. : Individual orphan drug prices can vary widely across European countries, although on average these differences are relatively minor. This study suggests that in Europe, we may not be able predict which country may have higher or lower prices for orphan drugs.
本研究通过比较法国、德国、意大利、挪威、西班牙、瑞典和英国等国类似可得的罕见病药物的年度治疗成本,评估了价格差异。每种药物的年度治疗成本是使用IHS POLI的出厂价格和各国价格数据库计算得出的。将对照国家的治疗成本与英国进行比较,并分析了比率。针对疾病领域和英国成本四分位数进行了亚组分析。纳入了120种罕见病药物。与英国相比,法国(1.13)、德国(1.11)、意大利(1.08)、西班牙(1.07)的平均成本更高,而瑞典(0.99)和挪威(0.88)的平均成本更低。平均比率提供了一个有限的视角,因为比率差异很大(从0.26到1.92),不同疾病领域也存在这种情况。成本四分位数之间的平均比率变化极小,这表明英国最贵和最便宜的罕见病药物的成本差异相似。尽管总体上这些差异相对较小,但个别罕见病药物在欧洲各国的价格可能差异很大。本研究表明,在欧洲,我们可能无法预测哪个国家的罕见病药物价格会更高或更低。