• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after heart transplant using pretransplant donor and recipient risk factors.高危受体是谁?利用移植前供体和受体危险因素预测心脏移植后的死亡率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):520-7; discussion 527. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.086. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after lung transplantation using pretransplant risk factors.谁是高风险受者?利用移植前风险因素预测肺移植后的死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Nov;138(5):1234-1238.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.036.
3
Impact of donor variables on heart transplantation outcomes in mechanically bridged versus standard recipients†.机械辅助过渡受者与标准受者中供体变量对心脏移植结局的影响†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;28(3):455-464. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy262.
4
Donor and recipient risk factor analysis of inferior postheart transplantation outcome in the era of durable mechanical assist devices.在耐用型机械辅助设备时代,心脏移植术后预后不良的供者和受者危险因素分析。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13390. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13390. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Association of recipient age and causes of heart transplant mortality: Implications for personalization of post-transplant management-An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry.受体年龄与心脏移植死亡原因的关联:对移植后管理个体化的启示——国际心肺移植学会注册中心的分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Apr;36(4):407-417. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
Post-heart transplant survival is inferior at low-volume centers across all risk strata.心脏移植术后的存活率在所有风险分层的低容量中心都较低。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S85-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926659.
7
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option as a bridge to heart transplant.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合作为心脏移植的桥接是一种可行的选择。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):140-147.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
8
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Heart-Lung Transplant Recipient Outcome: An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database.评估心肺移植受者结局的风险因素:对器官共享联合网络数据库的分析。
Circulation. 2019 Oct 8;140(15):1261-1272. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040682. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
9
Donor risk analysis and validation in heart transplants: a single-centre experience.心脏移植中的供体风险分析与验证:单中心经验。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec 7;31(6):860-867. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa207.
10
Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Under the New Heart Allocation System: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.体外膜肺氧合桥接在新的心脏分配系统下:一个联合器官共享网络数据库分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e007966. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007966. Epub 2021 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Influences of age and obesity on heart transplant outcomes.年龄和肥胖对心脏移植结果的影响。
JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 19;25:253-263. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.022. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Optimizing outcomes in heart transplantation: multidisciplinary Heart Teams and mechanical circulatory support for primary graft dysfunction.优化心脏移植结果:多学科心脏团队与针对原发性移植物功能障碍的机械循环支持
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Apr 28;27(Suppl 4):iv55-iv61. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf003. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Mortality prediction of heart transplantation using machine learning models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用机器学习模型预测心脏移植死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Apr 4;8:1551959. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1551959. eCollection 2025.
4
Risk Estimation of Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction in Heart Transplant Recipients Using a Smartphone.使用智能手机对心脏移植受者严重原发性移植物功能障碍的风险评估
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 8;26(1):25170. doi: 10.31083/RCM25170. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Impact of dual thoracic recovery from circulatory death donors on heart and lung transplant outcomes.双肺从循环性死亡供体获取对心肺移植结果的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;169(2):505-515.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
6
Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting the Risks of Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy and Cardiac Transplantation.用于预测持续性机械循环支持治疗和心脏移植风险的人工智能方法
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 3;13(7):2076. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072076.
7
Association Between High Sensitivity Troponin Levels Following Pediatric Orthotopic Heart Transplantation and Intensive Care Unit Resource Utilization.儿科原位心脏移植后高敏肌钙蛋白水平与重症监护病房资源利用的关系。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Apr;45(4):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03424-w. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Outcomes of COVID-19-Positive Donor Heart Transplantation in the United States.美国 COVID-19 阳性供体心脏移植的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 18;12(14):e029178. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029178. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
9
Prediction of Outcomes After Heart Transplantation in Pediatric Patients Using National Registry Data: Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches.利用国家登记数据预测小儿心脏移植后的结局:机器学习方法评估
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Jun 20;7:e45352. doi: 10.2196/45352.
10
The Clinical Outcomes of Marginal Donor Hearts: A Single Center Experience.边缘供体心脏的临床结局:单中心经验
Korean Circ J. 2023 Apr;53(4):254-267. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0197.

本文引用的文献

1
Posttransplant survival is not diminished in heart transplant recipients bridged with implantable left ventricular assist devices.接受植入式左心室辅助装置过渡的心脏移植受者,其移植后的生存率并未降低。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1425-32.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.034.
2
Matching high-risk recipients with marginal donor hearts is a clinically effective strategy.将高风险受体与边缘供体心脏进行匹配是一种临床有效的策略。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr;87(4):1066-70; discussion 1071. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.020.
3
The effect of ischemic time on survival after heart transplantation varies by donor age: an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.缺血时间对心脏移植术后生存的影响因供体年龄而异:器官共享联合网络数据库分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.019.
4
Survival after heart transplantation is not diminished among recipients with uncomplicated diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database.在无并发症的糖尿病患者心脏移植受者中,心脏移植后的生存率并未降低:器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Circulation. 2006 Nov 21;114(21):2280-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615708. Epub 2006 Nov 6.
5
Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates--2006.心脏移植的列入标准:国际心肺移植学会心脏移植候选者护理指南——2006年版
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Sep;25(9):1024-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.06.008.
6
Outcomes with an alternate list strategy for heart transplantation.心脏移植替代名单策略的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.014. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
7
Does heart transplantation confer survival benefit in all risk groups?心脏移植对所有风险组都能带来生存益处吗?
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Sep;24(9):1231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.08.008.
8
Alternate waiting list strategies for heart transplantation maximize donor organ utilization.心脏移植的候补名单替代策略可最大限度地提高供体器官利用率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jul;80(1):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.01.022.
9
Use of two recipient lists for adults requiring heart transplantation.针对需要心脏移植的成年人使用两个受者名单。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jan;125(1):49-59. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.62.
10
Consensus conference report: maximizing use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor: cardiac recommendations, March 28-29, 2001, Crystal City, Va.共识会议报告:最大限度利用从尸体供体获取的器官:心脏相关建议,2001年3月28 - 29日,弗吉尼亚州水晶城
Circulation. 2002 Aug 13;106(7):836-41. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000025587.40373.75.

高危受体是谁?利用移植前供体和受体危险因素预测心脏移植后的死亡率。

Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after heart transplant using pretransplant donor and recipient risk factors.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):520-7; discussion 527. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.086. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.086
PMID:21683337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4243707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study we sought the following: (1) To objectively assess the risk related to various pretransplant recipient and donor characteristics; (2) to devise a preoperative risk stratification score (RSS) based on pretransplant recipient and donor characteristics predicting graft loss at 1 year; and (3) to define different risk strata based on RSS.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing provided de-identified patient-level data. Analysis included 11,703 orthotopic heart transplant recipients aged 18 years or greater and transplanted between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2007. The primary outcome was 1-year graft failure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis (backward p value<0.20) was used to determine the relationship between pretransplant characteristics and 1-year graft failure. Using the odds ratio for each identified variable, an RSS was devised. The RSS strata were defined by calculating receiver operating characteristic curves and stratum specific likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

The strongest negative predictors of 1-year graft failure included the following: right ventricular assist device only, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, renal failure, extracorporeal left ventricular assist device, total artificial heart, and advanced age. Threshold analysis identified 5 discrete RSS strata: low risk (LR, RSS: <2.55; n=3242, 27.7%), intermediate risk (IR, RSS: 2.55-5.72; n=6,347, 54.2%), moderate risk (MR, RSS: 5.73-8.13; n=1,543, 13.2%), elevated risk (ER, RSS: 8.14-9.48; n=310, 2.6%), and high risk (HR, RSS: >9.48; n=261, 2.2%). The 1-year actuarial survival (%) in the LR, IR, MR, ER, and HR groups were 93.8, 89.2, 81.3, 67.0, and 47.0, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant recipient variables significantly influence early and late graft failure after heart transplantation. The RSS may improve organ allocation strategies by reducing the potential negative impact of transplanting candidates who are at a high risk for poor postoperative outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在:(1)客观评估各种移植前受者和供者特征相关的风险;(2)基于移植前受者和供者特征制定术前风险分层评分(RSS),预测 1 年移植物失功;(3)基于 RSS 定义不同的风险分层。

方法

美国器官共享网络提供了去标识化的患者水平数据。分析纳入了 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2007 年 12 月 31 日期间年龄≥18 岁接受了原位心脏移植的 11703 例患者。主要结局为 1 年移植物失功。多变量逻辑回归分析(向后 p 值<0.20)用于确定移植前特征与 1 年移植物失功之间的关系。利用每个确定变量的比值比,制定 RSS。通过计算接受者操作特征曲线和分层特异性似然比来定义 RSS 分层。

结果

1 年移植物失功的最强负预测因素包括以下内容:仅右心室辅助装置、体外膜肺氧合、肾衰竭、体外左心室辅助装置、全人工心脏和高龄。阈值分析确定了 5 个离散的 RSS 分层:低危(LR,RSS:<2.55;n=3242,27.7%)、中危(IR,RSS:2.55-5.72;n=6347,54.2%)、中高危(MR,RSS:5.73-8.13;n=1543,13.2%)、高危(ER,RSS:8.14-9.48;n=310,2.6%)和极高危(HR,RSS:>9.48;n=261,2.2%)。LR、IR、MR、ER 和 HR 组的 1 年累积生存率(%)分别为 93.8、89.2、81.3、67.0 和 47.0。

结论

移植前受者变量显著影响心脏移植后的早期和晚期移植物失功。RSS 可以通过减少移植候选者术后不良结局风险较高的潜在负面影响来改善器官分配策略。