• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贲门失弛缓症中胃食管反流病的误诊。

Erroneous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in achalasia.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1020-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.022
PMID:21683804
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most experienced gastroenterologists have seen one or several cases of achalasia patients who have been erroneously diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or even underwent antireflux surgery. We aim to describe the current knowledge about the diagnostic features of achalasia and their overlap with GERD. Furthermore, we present 3 cases in which achalasia was mistaken for GERD.

METHODS

Search of the literature published in English using the PubMed database and relevant abstracts presented at international conventions.

RESULTS

Typical features of GERD such as heartburn, retrosternal pain, esophagitis, and pathologic acid exposure can be observed in achalasia patients. Diagnostic tests such as endoscopy and radiography lack sensitivity and specificity for achalasia. Current diagnostic guidelines for antireflux surgery do not stipulate that achalasia should be ruled out preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical presentation as well as the diagnostic work-up of achalasia patients can show overlap with GERD. Mistaking achalasia for GERD can be avoided by esophageal manometry and this should therefore be performed in all patients undergoing surgical fundoplication.

摘要

背景与目的

大多数经验丰富的胃肠病学家都曾见过一例或多例贲门失弛缓症患者被误诊为胃食管反流病(GERD)甚至接受了抗反流手术的情况。我们旨在描述目前关于贲门失弛缓症的诊断特征及其与 GERD 的重叠,并介绍 3 例误诊为 GERD 的贲门失弛缓症患者。

方法

使用 PubMed 数据库检索发表的英文文献和国际会议上的相关摘要。

结果

GERD 的典型特征,如烧心、胸骨后疼痛、食管炎和病理性酸暴露,可在贲门失弛缓症患者中观察到。内镜检查和影像学等诊断性检查对贲门失弛缓症缺乏敏感性和特异性。目前用于抗反流手术的诊断指南并未规定术前应排除贲门失弛缓症。

结论

贲门失弛缓症患者的临床表现和诊断过程可能与 GERD 存在重叠。通过食管测压术可避免将贲门失弛缓症误诊为 GERD,因此应在所有接受手术胃底折叠术的患者中进行此项检查。

相似文献

1
Erroneous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in achalasia.贲门失弛缓症中胃食管反流病的误诊。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1020-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
[The influence of Barrett's esophagus on the clinical signs and postoperative results of GERD].[巴雷特食管对胃食管反流病临床症状及术后结果的影响]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Apr;129(2):99-103. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-816278.
3
Importance of Esophageal Manometry and pH Monitoring in the Evaluation of Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Study.食管测压和pH监测在难治性胃食管反流病患者评估中的重要性:一项多中心研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Jul;26(7):548-50. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0189. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
[Surgical treatment of neuromuscular diseases of the esophagus].[食管神经肌肉疾病的外科治疗]
Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2011(2):125-9.
5
A high-resolution view of achalasia.贲门失弛缓症的高分辨率视图。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;43(7):644-51. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318176ab94.
6
Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical?胃食管反流病的诊断评估:可行与实用的区别是什么?
Hepatogastroenterology. 1992 Feb;39 Suppl 1:3-13.
7
[Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease].[肥胖与胃食管反流病]
Rev Invest Clin. 2002 Jul-Aug;54(4):320-7.
8
Esophageal function studies in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.食管功能研究在胃食管反流病管理中的应用
Int J Surg Investig. 1999;1(4):351-6.
9
[Postoperative evaluation of esophageal mucosal change dynamics in patients with reflux diseases].[反流性疾病患者食管黏膜变化动态的术后评估]
Wiad Lek. 1997;50 Suppl 1 Pt 1:273-81.
10
Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation characteristics using a sleeve sensor in clinical manometry.临床测压中使用套管传感器的食管下括约肌松弛特征
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Dec;93(12):2373-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00690.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a Danish single center 10-year follow-up study.经口内镜下肌切开术:一项丹麦单中心10年随访研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11832-z.
2
Update Motility Disorders: Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease - Diagnostic and Conservative Approach.动力障碍性疾病的最新进展:胃食管反流病——诊断与保守治疗方法
Visc Med. 2024 Dec;40(6):299-309. doi: 10.1159/000541358. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
3
Development and Validation of Serum Markers as Noninvasive Diagnostic Methods for Achalasia.贲门失弛缓症血清标志物作为无创诊断方法的开发与验证
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;15(1):e00651. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000651.
4
Achalasia: The Current Clinical Dilemma and Possible Pathogenesis.贲门失弛缓症:当前的临床困境及可能的发病机制
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Apr 30;29(2):145-155. doi: 10.5056/jnm22176.
5
Trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease research: A bibliometric and visualized study.胃食管反流病研究趋势:一项文献计量学与可视化研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 29;9:994534. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.994534. eCollection 2022.
6
Combination of Symptom Profile, Endoscopic Findings, and Esophageal Mucosal Histopathology Helps to Differentiate Achalasia from Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.症状特征、内镜检查结果和食管黏膜组织病理学相结合有助于鉴别贲门失弛缓症与难治性胃食管反流病。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;11(12):2347. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122347.
7
Thailand guideline 2020 for medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.泰国 2020 年胃食管反流病医学管理指南。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;37(4):632-643. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15758. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
8
Diagnosis and Management of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.难治性胃食管反流病的诊断与管理
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2021 Jul;17(7):305-315.
9
Advances in The Diagnosis and Treatment of Achalasia of The Cardia: a Review.贲门失弛缓症的诊断与治疗进展:综述
J Transl Int Med. 2021 Mar 31;9(1):24-31. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2021-0009. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Predictors of Abnormal Functional Luminal Impedance Planimetry Findings in Non-mechanical Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.非机械性食管胃结合部流出道梗阻的功能性腔内阻抗测量异常的预测因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Nov;66(11):3968-3975. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06726-0. Epub 2020 Nov 28.