Psychiatry and Law Service, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;20(3):577-90. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.001.
To persuade a fact finder that a forensic opinion has a scientific basis, it is often useful to cite professional literature that supports one's opinions or procedures. If the admissibility of one's opinion is challenged in a Daubert hearing, citing literature is almost always required to support the claim that the expert's opinion relies on scientific facts or proceeds from scientific methodology. This annotated bibliography provides a sampling of articles that may be useful in bolstering testimony. The sample selected here is not comprehensive, but provides examples of literature that may be cited by forensic child and adolescent psychiatric experts.
为了使事实调查者相信法医意见具有科学依据，引用支持自己观点或程序的专业文献通常很有用。如果在 Daubert 听证会上对意见的可采性提出质疑，几乎总是需要引用文献来支持专家意见依赖科学事实或源自科学方法的主张。这份带注释的参考书目提供了一些可能有助于支持证言的文章示例。这里选择的样本并不全面，但提供了法医儿童和青少年精神病学专家可能引用的文献示例。
