Scientific Resource Center, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program, Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
This article discusses search methodology to identify evidence for comparative effectiveness reviews (CERs) as practiced by the Effective Health Care program.
Review.
Search methods described attempt to overcome the bias inherent in the publication and distribution of clinical evidence. Bibliographic databases and search strategies are discussed with special emphasis on searching for observational studies and harms data. Other techniques described include the use of key articles, citation tracking, hand searching, and personal communications. Strategies for locating gray literature, such as clinical trial protocols and regulatory information, are described. Search reporting and other practical matters are also discussed.
Better reporting and further research on search strategies is needed to develop additional evidence-based recommendations.
本文讨论了有效保健计划(Effective Health Care program)实践中用于确定比较效果评估(CER)证据的检索方法。
综述。
所描述的检索方法旨在克服临床证据的发表和传播中固有的偏见。特别强调了检索观察性研究和危害数据的书目数据库和检索策略。还描述了其他技术,包括使用关键文章、引文追踪、手工检索和个人通信。描述了查找灰色文献(如临床试验方案和监管信息)的策略。还讨论了检索报告和其他实际问题。
需要更好的报告和进一步的检索策略研究,以制定更多基于证据的建议。