School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114397. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114397. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
Disease outbreaks and disasters can result in excess deaths and severe disruption of usual end-of-life care processes. We aimed to: i) synthesise evidence describing the experiences of health and social care staff providing end-of-life care during a disease outbreak or humanitarian disaster, ii) understand the impact on their mental health and wellbeing and, iii) identify means of support.
A systematic review with meta-synthesis was conducted including studies of health and social care staff providing end-of-life care during disease outbreaks (Ebola, COVID-19, SARs, MERs) or humanitarian disasters (2001-2020). MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and grey literature databases were searched systematically, with forward and backward citation searching of included studies. Any research study designs, in any care settings, were included. Study quality was assessed using an appraisal tool relevant to each study design. Qualitative meta-synthesis was used to analyse the findings, which were then reported narratively. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020181444.
Nineteen studies were included, including 10 Ebola studies and two COVID-19 studies. The analysis generated two superordinate themes: individual experience and organisational responsibilities. Individual experience comprised four themes: dignity in death, positive experiences, negative experience and support for staff. Organisational responsibilities comprised four themes: preparation, adaption, resources, and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
No studies quantitively measured the impact of providing end-of-life care on staff mental health and wellbeing, however qualitative studies described experiences in varied settings. Serious disease outbreaks and disasters can expose care staff to abnormally high levels of mortality and suffering. Health and social care systems need to proactively prepare for future events and enable peer support mechanisms that may help mitigate experiences of psychological distress in humanitarian crises.
疾病爆发和灾害可能导致超额死亡和常规临终关怀过程的严重中断。我们的目的是:i)综合描述在疾病爆发或人道主义灾害期间提供临终关怀的卫生和社会保健工作人员的经验,ii)了解对其心理健康和福利的影响,以及 iii)确定支持手段。
进行了系统的综述和元综合,包括在疾病爆发期间(埃博拉、COVID-19、SARS、MERS)或人道主义灾害期间(2001-2020 年)提供临终关怀的卫生和社会保健工作人员的研究。系统地搜索了 MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase、PsycInfo、Web of Science 和灰色文献数据库,并对纳入研究进行了前瞻性和回溯性引文搜索。纳入了任何护理环境下的任何研究设计的研究。使用与每种研究设计相关的评估工具评估研究质量。定性元综合用于分析研究结果,然后以叙述的方式报告。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42020181444。
纳入了 19 项研究,包括 10 项埃博拉研究和 2 项 COVID-19 研究。分析产生了两个超主题:个人经验和组织责任。个人经验包括四个主题:死亡尊严、积极体验、负面体验和对员工的支持。组织责任包括四个主题:准备、适应、资源和个人防护设备(PPE)。
没有研究定量测量提供临终关怀对员工心理健康和福利的影响,但是定性研究描述了不同环境下的经验。严重的疾病爆发和灾害可能使护理人员面临异常高的死亡率和痛苦。卫生和社会保健系统需要积极为未来的事件做好准备,并建立同伴支持机制,这可能有助于减轻人道主义危机中的心理困扰。