Suppr超能文献

用于大学医院副球孢子菌病患者的常规诊断检测的准确性。

Accuracy of routine diagnostic tests used in paracoccidioidomycosis patients at a university hospital.

机构信息

Área de Doenças Tropicais, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Aug;105(8):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.03.001.

Abstract

The identification of appropriate laboratory measures to confirm clinical hypotheses is important in routine paracoccidioidomycosis medical care. The clinical records and laboratory reports of 401 paracoccidioidomycosis patients attended at the Tropical Diseases Area, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, from 1974 to 2008 were reviewed. Direct mycological (DM), cell block (CB), histopathological (HP), and double immunodiffusion (DID) tests were evaluated before treatment. Typical Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast forms were observed in clinical specimens of 86% of the patients, but 14% were detected only by serological test. DM of 51 different tissue specimens produced 74.5% sensitivity, and 62.5% sensitivity was observed in 112 sputum samples. CB in 483 sputum samples generated 55.3% sensitivity. HP performed in 239 samples from different tissues revealed 96.7% sensitivity. Serology carried out in 351 patients and 200 healthy controls provided 90.0% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% positive predictive value, 85.1% negative predictive value and 93.6% accuracy. Comparisons of laboratory measurements performed in the same patient showed that sensitivity decreases from HP to DID to CB and DM, with the last two assays providing similar sensitivities. This study demonstrated that P. brasiliensis identification by HP, CB, and/or DM associated with DID is sufficient to establish the laboratorial diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis in practically all cases.

摘要

在常规的副球孢子菌病医疗中,确定合适的实验室检测方法来证实临床假设是很重要的。我们回顾了 1974 年至 2008 年期间在 Botucatu 医学院热带病区就诊的 401 例副球孢子菌病患者的临床记录和实验室报告。在治疗前评估了直接真菌学(DM)、细胞块(CB)、组织病理学(HP)和双扩散免疫(DID)检测。86%的患者临床标本中观察到典型的巴西副球孢子菌酵母样形态,但 14%的患者仅通过血清学检测发现。51 份不同组织标本的 DM 检测敏感性为 74.5%,112 份痰标本的敏感性为 62.5%。483 份痰标本的 CB 检测敏感性为 55.3%。239 份来自不同组织的 HP 检测敏感性为 96.7%。对 351 例患者和 200 例健康对照者进行血清学检测,敏感性为 90.0%,特异性为 100.0%,阳性预测值为 100.0%,阴性预测值为 85.1%,准确性为 93.6%。对同一患者进行的实验室检测结果进行比较显示,敏感性从 HP 到 DID 再到 CB 和 DM 逐渐降低,后两种检测方法的敏感性相似。本研究表明,HP、CB 和/或 DM 联合 DID 可识别巴西副球孢子菌,几乎可在所有病例中确立副球孢子菌病的实验室诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验