• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紫丁香(丁香属,木犀科)叶绿体 DNA 系统发育:质体组群与杂交群具有很强的相关性。

A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of lilacs (Syringa, Oleaceae): plastome groups show a strong correlation with crossing groups.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Yeungnam University, Keongsan, Keongbuk, Korea 712-749;

出版信息

Am J Bot. 1998 Sep;85(9):1338-51.

PMID:21685019
Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships and genomic compatibility were compared for 60 accessions of Syringa using chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) and nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) markers. A total of 669 cpDNA variants, 653 of which were potentially phylogenetically informative, was detected using 22 restriction enzymes. Phylogenetic analyses reveal four strongly supported plastome groups that correspond to four genetically incompatible crossing groups. Relationships of the four plastome groups (I(II(III,IV))) correlate well with the infrageneric classification except for ser. Syringa and Pinnatifoliae. Group I, which includes subg. Ligustrina, forms a basal lineage within Syringa. Group II includes ser. Syringa and Pinnatifoliae and the two series have high compatibility and low sequence divergence. Group III consists of three well-defined species groups of ser. Pubescentes. Group IV comprises all members of ser. Villosae and has the lowest interspecific cpDNA sequence divergences. Comparison of cpDNA sequence divergence with crossability data indicates that hybrids have not been successfully generated between species with divergence greater than 0.7%. Hybrid barriers are strong among the four major plastome groups, which have sequence divergence estimates ranging from 1.096 to 1.962%. In contrast, fully fertile hybrids occur between species pairs with sequence divergence below 0.4%. Three regions of the plastome have length variants of greater than 100 bp, and these indels identify 12 different plastome types that correlate with phylogenetic trees produced from cpDNA restriction site data. Biparentally inherited nuclear rDNA and maternally inherited cpDNA length variants enable the identification of the specific parentage of several lilac hybrids.

摘要

使用叶绿体 DNA (cpDNA) 和核核糖体 DNA (rDNA) 标记物,对 60 种丁香属植物进行了系统发育关系和基因组相容性比较。使用 22 种限制酶检测到了总共 669 种 cpDNA 变体,其中 653 种具有潜在的系统发育信息。系统发育分析显示,有四个强烈支持的质体组,与四个遗传上不相容的杂交组相对应。四个质体组(I(II(III,IV)))的关系与种下分类很好地相关,除了丁香属和 Pinnatifoliae 外。包含 subg. Ligustrina 的组 I 在丁香属中形成一个基础谱系。组 II 包括丁香属和 Pinnatifoliae,这两个系列具有高相容性和低序列分歧。组 III 由三个明确界定的 pubescentes 系列组成。组 IV 包括所有 Villosae 系列的成员,具有最低的种间 cpDNA 序列分歧。将 cpDNA 序列分歧与可交配性数据进行比较表明,在分化大于 0.7%的物种之间,杂种尚未成功产生。四个主要质体组之间的杂种障碍很强,它们的序列分歧估计值在 1.096 到 1.962%之间。相比之下,在序列分歧低于 0.4%的种对之间,会产生完全可育的杂种。叶绿体基因组的三个区域具有大于 100bp 的长度变异,这些插入缺失可识别出 12 种不同的叶绿体类型,这些类型与 cpDNA 限制酶位点数据生成的系统发育树相关。双亲遗传的核 rDNA 和母系遗传的 cpDNA 长度变异使几种丁香杂种的特定亲代身份得以识别。

相似文献

1
A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of lilacs (Syringa, Oleaceae): plastome groups show a strong correlation with crossing groups.紫丁香(丁香属,木犀科)叶绿体 DNA 系统发育:质体组群与杂交群具有很强的相关性。
Am J Bot. 1998 Sep;85(9):1338-51.
2
Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae).栎属(壳斗科)栎亚属的系统发育、生物地理学及分子分化过程
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Aug;12(3):333-49. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0614.
3
The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group.龟兔赛跑:在一个新近分化的植物类群中,选择非编码质体基因组和核 Adh 序列进行系统发育重建。
Am J Bot. 1998 Sep;85(9):1301-15.
4
Phylogenetic relationships within Cornus (Cornaceae) based on 26S rDNA sequences.基于26S核糖体DNA序列的山茱萸属(山茱萸科)系统发育关系
Am J Bot. 2001 Jun;88(6):1131-8.
5
Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogeny of the Berberidaceae.小檗科叶绿体DNA限制性位点变异与系统发育
Am J Bot. 1998 Dec;85(12):1766-78.
6
A CHLOROPLAST-DNA PHYLOGENY OF THE WILD PERENNIAL RELATIVES OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE SUBGENUS GLYCINE): CONGRUENCE WITH MORPHOLOGICAL AND CROSSING GROUPS.大豆野生多年生近缘种(大豆属大豆亚属)的叶绿体DNA系统发育:与形态学和杂交群体的一致性
Evolution. 1990 Mar;44(2):371-389. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05206.x.
7
Molecular phylogeography, reticulation, and lineage sorting in Mediterranean Senecio sect. Senecio (Asteraceae).地中海千里光属千里光组的分子系统地理学、网状进化和谱系分选(菊科)
Evolution. 2001 Oct;55(10):1943-62.
8
Study of the evolutionary relationships among Limonium species (Plumbaginaceae) using nuclear and cytoplasmic molecular markers.利用核分子标记和细胞质分子标记对补血草属(蓝雪科)物种间进化关系的研究
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Feb;14(2):232-49. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0690.
9
[Analysis of microsatellite loci of the chloroplast genome in the genus Capsicum (Pepper)].辣椒属叶绿体基因组微卫星位点分析
Genetika. 2004 Aug;40(8):1093-8.
10
DISCORDANCE BETWEEN NUCLEAR AND CHLOROPLAST PHYLOGENIES IN THE HEUCHERA GROUP (SAXIFRAGACEAE).矾根属(虎耳草科)中核基因与叶绿体基因系统发育的不一致性。
Evolution. 1995 Aug;49(4):727-742. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02309.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Syringa based on chloroplast genomic DNA barcoding.基于叶绿体基因组 DNA 条形码鉴定和系统发育分析丁香属植物。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0271633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271633. eCollection 2022.
2
Resolving the Phylogeny of the Olive Family (Oleaceae): Confronting Information from Organellar and Nuclear Genomes.解决橄榄科的系统发育问题:来自细胞器和核基因组的信息交锋。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;11(12):1508. doi: 10.3390/genes11121508.
3
Identification of new polymorphic regions and differentiation of cultivated olives (Olea europaea L.) through plastome sequence comparison.
利用质体基因组序列比较鉴定新的多态性区域和栽培油橄榄(Olea europaea L.)的分化。
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Sep 24;10:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-211.
4
Molecular markers derived from RAPD, SCAR, and the conserved 18S rDNA sequences for classification and identification in Pyrus pyrifolia and P. communis.源自随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)、序列特征化扩增区域(SCAR)以及保守的18S核糖体DNA(rDNA)序列的分子标记,用于白梨和西洋梨的分类与鉴定。
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 May;108(8):1487-91. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1582-8. Epub 2004 Jan 29.