Suppr超能文献

数字化定量分析五种高级别前列腺癌模式,包括筛状模式,及其与不良结局的关系。

Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jul;136(1):98-107. doi: 10.1309/AJCPZ7WBU9YXSJPE.

Abstract

Proper grading of the cribriform prostate cancer pattern has not previously been supported by outcome-based evidence. Among 153 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, 76 with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (≥0.2 ng/mL [0.2 μg/L]) were matched to 77 without failure. Frequencies of high-grade patterns included fused small acini, 83.7%; papillary, 52.3%; large cribriform, 37.9%; small (≤12 lumens) cribriform, 17.0%; and individual cells, 22.9%. A cribriform pattern was present in 61% (46/76) of failures but 16% (12/77) of nonfailures (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis showed the cribriform pattern had the highest odds ratio for PSA failure, 5.89 (95% confidence interval, 2.53-13.70; P < .0001). The presence of both large and small cribriform patterns was significantly linked to failure. The cumulative odds ratio of failure per added square millimeter of cribriform pattern was 1.173 (P = .008), higher than for any other pattern. All 8 men with a cribriform area sum of 25 mm(2) or more had failure (range, 33-930). Regrading cribriform cancer as Gleason 5 improved the grade association with failure, although half of all cases with individual cells also had a cribriform pattern, precluding a precise determination of the independent importance of the latter. The cribriform pattern has particularly adverse implications for outcome.

摘要

前列腺筛状癌模式的正确分级以前没有得到基于结果的证据的支持。在 153 名接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性中,有 76 名前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)失败(≥0.2ng/mL[0.2μg/L])与 77 名无失败患者相匹配。高级别模式的频率包括融合小腺泡,83.7%;乳头状,52.3%;大筛状,37.9%;小(≤12 个管腔)筛状,17.0%;和单个细胞,22.9%。在 61%(46/76)的失败病例中存在筛状模式,但在 16%(12/77)的非失败病例中存在(P<.0001)。多变量分析显示,筛状模式与 PSA 失败的比值比最高,为 5.89(95%置信区间,2.53-13.70;P<.0001)。大筛状和小筛状模式的存在与失败显著相关。每增加 1 平方毫米筛状模式的失败累积比值比为 1.173(P=.008),高于任何其他模式。所有 8 名筛状面积总和为 25mm2或以上的患者均有失败(范围为 33-930)。将筛状癌重新分级为 Gleason 5 可提高与失败的分级相关性,尽管一半的具有单个细胞的病例也有筛状模式,这使得后者的独立重要性无法准确确定。筛状模式对结果有特别不利的影响。

相似文献

10
Significance of the cribriform pattern in prostatic adenocarcinomas.筛状模式在前列腺腺癌中的意义。
Pathol Res Pract. 2014 Sep;210(9):554-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Specific Impact of Cribriform Pattern in Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后筛状模式的年龄特异性影响
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2025 Aug 9;19:11795549251363324. doi: 10.1177/11795549251363324. eCollection 2025.
2
[Current grading of prostate cancer. German version].[前列腺癌的当前分级。德文版]
Pathologie (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00292-025-01446-6.
7

本文引用的文献

7
Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?格里森评分与致命性前列腺癌:3+4 等于 4+3 吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 20;27(21):3459-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4669. Epub 2009 May 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验