Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis TN 38163, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):43-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2011.043661. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
From the perspective of investigators conducting research involving pregnant women and fetuses, a woman's decision about whether to have an abortion can sometimes be relevant to the suitability of the woman and fetus as research subjects. However, prominent ethicists disagree over whether it is permissible for a woman's decision about abortion to be an inclusion or exclusion criterion for participation in research. A widely held view is that fetuses to be aborted and fetuses to be carried to term should be treated equally as research subjects. Some hold that this principle implies that a woman's decision about whether to have an abortion should not be an inclusion or exclusion criterion. This paper identifies types of research in which investigators might want to have inclusion or exclusion criteria based on decisions about abortion. It examines the arguments for and against having the woman's decision about abortion included in such criteria. It is argued that there are types of research in which such criteria are ethically permissible.
从研究涉及孕妇和胎儿的研究人员的角度来看,女性是否决定堕胎有时可能与女性和胎儿作为研究对象的适宜性有关。然而,杰出的伦理学家对于女性关于堕胎的决定是否可以作为参与研究的纳入或排除标准存在分歧。一种广泛持有的观点是,即将被堕胎的胎儿和足月胎儿应该被平等对待,作为研究对象。一些人认为,这一原则意味着女性关于是否堕胎的决定不应作为纳入或排除标准。本文确定了研究人员可能希望根据堕胎决定设立纳入或排除标准的研究类型。本文考察了将女性关于堕胎的决定纳入此类标准的正反两方面论点。本文认为,在某些类型的研究中,这种标准在伦理上是可以接受的。