• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化临床决策支持系统用户界面设计的四项原则。

Four principles for user interface design of computerised clinical decision support systems.

作者信息

Kanstrup Anne Marie, Christiansen Marion Berg, Nøhr Christian

机构信息

Department of Communication, Aalborg University.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:65-73.

PMID:21685612
Abstract

The paper presents results from a design research project of a user interface (UI) for a Computerised Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS). The ambition has been to design Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) that can minimise medication errors. Through an iterative design process a digital prototype for prescription of medicine has been developed. This paper presents results from the formative evaluation of the prototype conducted in a simulation laboratory with ten participating physicians. Data from the simulation is analysed by use of theory on how users perceive information. The conclusion is a model, which sum up four principles of interaction for design of CDSS. The four principles for design of user interfaces for CDSS are summarised as four A's: All in one, At a glance, At hand and Attention. The model emphasises integration of all four interaction principles in the design of user interfaces for CDSS, i.e. the model is an integrated model which we suggest as a guide for interaction design when working with preventing medication errors.

摘要

本文展示了一个针对计算机化临床决策支持系统(CDSS)用户界面(UI)的设计研究项目的成果。其目标是设计出能够将用药错误降至最低的人机交互(HCI)方式。通过迭代设计过程,开发出了一个用于药物处方的数字原型。本文展示了在模拟实验室中对该原型进行的形成性评估结果,有十位参与的医生参与了评估。利用关于用户如何感知信息的理论对模拟数据进行了分析。得出的结论是一个模型,该模型总结了CDSS设计的四个交互原则。CDSS用户界面设计的四个原则概括为四个“A”:一体化(All in one)、一目了然(At a glance)、随手可得(At hand)和引人注意(Attention)。该模型强调在CDSS用户界面设计中整合所有这四个交互原则,即该模型是一个综合模型,我们建议在致力于预防用药错误时将其作为交互设计的指南。

相似文献

1
Four principles for user interface design of computerised clinical decision support systems.计算机化临床决策支持系统用户界面设计的四项原则。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:65-73.
2
Implementation of a taxonomy aiming to support the design of a contextualised clinical decision support system.实施一种旨在支持情境化临床决策支持系统设计的分类法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:74-83.
3
Medication related computerized decision support system (CDSS): make it a clinicians' partner!药物相关计算机决策支持系统(CDSS):使其成为临床医生的伙伴!
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:84-94.
4
Clinical decision support software for management of chronic heart failure: development and evaluation.用于慢性心力衰竭管理的临床决策支持软件:开发与评估
Comput Biol Med. 2006 May;36(5):495-506. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.02.002. Epub 2005 May 31.
5
Applying a user centered design methodology in a clinical context.在临床环境中应用以用户为中心的设计方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):927-31.
6
Usability and efficiency. The HELIOS approach to development of user interfaces.可用性与效率。HELIOS 用户界面开发方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994 Dec;45 Suppl:S47-64.
7
Designing information technology to support prescribing decision making.设计信息技术以支持处方决策。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13(6):450-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.6.450.
8
The safety and quality of decision support systems.决策支持系统的安全性与质量。
Yearb Med Inform. 2006:20-5.
9
Using BPI and emerging technology to improve patient safety.利用最佳实践信息(BPI)和新兴技术提高患者安全。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2004 Winter;18(1):65-71.
10
Cognitive engineering in interface design.界面设计中的认知工程学。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;90:123-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.血糖解读的意义与行动:通过文字描述增强1型糖尿病的决策制定
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Sep 9;16:20420188251362089. doi: 10.1177/20420188251362089. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring Algorithmic Explainability: Generating Explainable AI Insights for Personalized Clinical Decision Support Focused on Cannabis Intoxication in Young Adults.探索算法可解释性:为聚焦于年轻成年人大麻中毒的个性化临床决策支持生成可解释的人工智能见解。
2024 Int Conf Act Behav Comput (2024). 2024 May;2024. doi: 10.1109/abc61795.2024.10652070. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Artificial Intelligence: A Shifting Paradigm in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Medicine.
人工智能:心血管医学中不断变化的范式。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 6;10(23):5710. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235710.
4
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Medication Decision Support Systems in Electronic Medical Records: Mixed Methods Approach Based on Structural Equation Modeling and Qualitative Analysis.电子病历中药物决策支持系统实施的障碍与促进因素:基于结构方程模型和定性分析的混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 22;8(7):e18758. doi: 10.2196/18758.
5
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化决策支持系统对心血管风险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.
6
Clinician preferences for computerised clinical decision support for medications in primary care: a focus group study.基层医疗中临床医生对药物计算机化临床决策支持的偏好:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Apr;26(1):0. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000015.
7
The design of decisions: Matching clinical decision support recommendations to Nielsen's design heuristics.决策设计:将临床决策支持建议与尼尔森设计启发法相匹配。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Sep;117:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
Interface, information, interaction: a narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support.界面、信息、交互:临床决策支持的设计和功能需求的叙述性综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):585-592. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx118.