Suppr超能文献

运用文献计量学来辅助您选择护理术语集。

Using bibliometrics to support your selection of a nursing terminology set.

作者信息

Anderson Christine A, Keenan Gail, Jones Josette

机构信息

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Comput Inform Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):82-90; quiz 91-2. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181972a24.

Abstract

Nurses are being pressured to integrate standardized nursing terminology into the electronic health record to enable the representation and evaluation of nursing practice. Five terminology sets are recognized by the American Nurses Association that contain terms to represent nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and intervention: CCC, ICNP, NANDA/NOC/NIC, Omaha System, and PNDS. Key criteria for choosing the most suitable include demonstrated use and testing under real-time clinical conditions, scope of terms, cost, and the administrative infrastructure to sustain and evolve the terminology. Likelihood of survival is also critical and was evaluated here by examining the diffusion pattern of each terminology set through bibliometric analysis. Each of the five sets had a unique diffusion pattern, with NANDA/NOC/NIC demonstrating the most extensive penetration and author network in the CINAHL literature examined from 1982 to 2006.

摘要

护士们面临着将标准化护理术语整合到电子健康记录中的压力,以便对护理实践进行呈现和评估。美国护士协会认可了五套术语集,其中包含用于表示护理诊断、结果和干预措施的术语:CCC、ICNP、NANDA/NOC/NIC、奥马哈系统和PNDS。选择最合适术语集的关键标准包括在实时临床条件下的实际使用和测试、术语范围、成本以及维持和发展该术语的管理基础设施。生存可能性也至关重要,本文通过文献计量分析研究各术语集的传播模式来对此进行评估。这五套术语集中的每一套都有独特的传播模式,在1982年至2006年检查的CINAHL文献中,NANDA/NOC/NIC显示出最广泛的渗透和作者网络。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验