Suppr超能文献

益生菌屎肠球菌 SF68 对动物收容所中犬猫腹泻发生情况的影响。

Effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium SF68 on presence of diarrhea in cats and dogs housed in an animal shelter.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1678, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Intern Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):856-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.0738.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beneficial effects of probiotics have never been analyzed in an animal shelter.

HYPOTHESIS

Dogs and cats housed in an animal shelter and administered a probiotic are less likely to have diarrhea of ≥2 days duration than untreated controls.

ANIMALS

Two hundred and seventeen cats and 182 dogs.

METHODS

Double blinded and placebo controlled. Shelter dogs and cats were housed in 2 separate rooms for each species. For 4 weeks, animals in 1 room for each species was fed Enterococcus faecium SF68 while animals in the other room were fed a placebo. After a 1-week washout period, the treatments by room were switched and the study continued an additional 4 weeks. A standardized fecal score system was applied to feces from each animal every day by a blinded individual. Feces of animals with and without diarrhea were evaluated for enteric parasites. Data were analyzed by a generalized linear mixed model using a binomial distribution with treatment being a fixed effect and the room being a random effect.

RESULTS

The percentage of cats with diarrhea ≥2 days was significantly lower (P = .0297) in the probiotic group (7.4%) when compared with the placebo group (20.7%). Statistical differences between groups of dogs were not detected but diarrhea was uncommon in both groups of dogs during the study.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Cats fed SF68 had fewer episodes of diarrhea of ≥2 days when compared with controls suggests the probiotic may have beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal tract.

摘要

背景

益生菌的有益效果从未在动物收容所中进行过分析。

假设

在动物收容所中饲养并给予益生菌的狗和猫发生持续时间≥2 天的腹泻的可能性低于未治疗的对照组。

动物

182 只狗和 217 只猫。

方法

双盲和安慰剂对照。将动物收容所中的狗和猫分别安置在 2 个单独的房间中。对于每只动物,其中一个房间中的动物在 4 周内喂食屎肠球菌 SF68,而另一个房间中的动物喂食安慰剂。经过 1 周的洗脱期后,房间中的治疗方法被切换,研究又继续进行了 4 周。由一名盲法个体每天对每个动物的粪便应用标准化粪便评分系统。评估有和没有腹泻的动物的粪便中是否存在肠道寄生虫。使用具有治疗作用的固定效应和房间作为随机效应的二项式分布的广义线性混合模型对数据进行分析。

结果

与安慰剂组(20.7%)相比,益生菌组(7.4%)中持续时间≥2 天的猫腹泻百分比显著降低(P=.0297)。两组狗之间未检测到统计学差异,但在研究期间两组狗的腹泻均不常见。

结论和临床意义

与对照组相比,喂食 SF68 的猫腹泻持续时间≥2 天的发作次数更少,这表明益生菌可能对胃肠道有益。

相似文献

4
Influence of Enterococcus faecium SF68 probiotic on giardiasis in dogs.屎肠球菌SF68益生菌对犬贾第虫病的影响。
J Vet Intern Med. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):476-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0283.x. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Probiotics: considerations for human health.益生菌:对人类健康的考量
Nutr Rev. 2003 Mar;61(3):91-9. doi: 10.1301/nr.2003.marr.91-99.
10
Probiotics: effects on immunity.益生菌:对免疫力的影响
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):444S-450S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.444s.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验