• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比口服聚乙二醇和大剂量甘油灌肠剂与单独使用大剂量甘油灌肠剂在接受结直肠恶性肿瘤手术的患者中的效果:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of oral polyethylene glycol plus a large volume glycerine enema with a large volume glycerine enema alone in patients undergoing colorectal surgery for malignancy: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Division of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):e327-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02689.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02689.x
PMID:21689356
Abstract

AIM

Recent meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have concluded that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before elective colorectal surgery is not associated with a reduction of surgical site infection (SSI). The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the impact of preoperative MBP for colon and rectal cancer surgery in comparison with a single glycerine enema.

METHOD

Patients scheduled for radical colorectal resection for malignancy with primary anastomosis were randomized to preoperative MBP (4 l of polyethylene glycol) (group 1, 114 patients) plus a glycerine 5% enema (2 l) or a single glycerine 5% enema (2 l) (group 2, 115 patients). The postoperative incidence of SSI was recorded prospectively. Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopy or robotic) accounted for 55 and 51 in groups 1 and 2 respectively.

RESULTS

In all, 229 patients were included in the study, 114 in group 1 and 115 in group 2. At least one SSI was reported in 16 (14.0%) group 1 and in 20 (17.8%) group 2 patients (P=0.475). Perioperative mortality was nil. The incidence of SSI was comparable also in the 73 patients who had a low anterior resection (seven of 33 vs eight of 40, P=1.000), and for the 106 patients who underwent a minimally invasive procedure (nine of 55 vs four of 51, P=0.241).

CONCLUSION

A single large-volume glycerine enema is effective bowel preparation before colorectal resection whether performed by an open or minimally invasive technique.

摘要

目的

最近的荟萃分析和随机临床试验得出结论,择期结直肠手术前进行机械肠道准备(MBP)与减少手术部位感染(SSI)无关。本随机临床试验的目的是评估与单次甘油灌肠相比,在结肠癌和直肠癌手术前进行MBP 的影响。

方法

将计划行根治性结直肠切除术治疗恶性肿瘤并进行一期吻合的患者随机分为术前 MBP(4 升聚乙二醇)组(114 例患者)和 MBP 组(114 例患者)加甘油 5%灌肠(2 升)或单次甘油 5%灌肠(2 升)组(115 例患者)。前瞻性记录术后 SSI 的发生率。接受微创手术(腹腔镜或机器人)的患者分别占组 1 和组 2 的 55%和 51%。

结果

共有 229 例患者纳入研究,组 1 114 例,组 2 115 例。组 1 中有 16 例(14.0%)至少报告了 1 例 SSI,组 2 中有 20 例(17.8%)(P=0.475)。围手术期无死亡病例。行低位前切除术的 73 例患者(33 例中有 7 例,40 例中有 8 例,P=1.000)和 106 例行微创手术的患者(55 例中有 9 例,51 例中有 4 例,P=0.241)之间的 SSI 发生率也相似。

结论

无论采用开放还是微创技术,单次大剂量甘油灌肠是一种有效的结直肠切除术前肠道准备方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of oral polyethylene glycol plus a large volume glycerine enema with a large volume glycerine enema alone in patients undergoing colorectal surgery for malignancy: a randomized clinical trial.对比口服聚乙二醇和大剂量甘油灌肠剂与单独使用大剂量甘油灌肠剂在接受结直肠恶性肿瘤手术的患者中的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):e327-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02689.x.
2
Randomized clinical trial of bowel preparation with a single phosphate enema or polyethylene glycol before elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术前使用单磷酸灌肠剂或聚乙二醇进行肠道准备的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2006 Apr;93(4):427-33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5274.
3
Preoperative polyethylene glycol versus a single enema in elective bowel surgery.择期肠道手术中术前聚乙二醇与单次灌肠的比较。
Dig Surg. 2007;24(1):54-7; discussion 57-8. doi: 10.1159/000100919. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
4
Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery.择期左侧结直肠癌手术前机械性肠道准备与不准备的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2005 Apr;92(4):409-14. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4900.
5
Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial.不进行机械肠道准备的结肠和直肠手术:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):363-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000055222.90581.59.
6
Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for left-sided colonic anastomosis? Results of a prospective randomized trial.左侧结肠吻合术是否必须进行机械性肠道准备?一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
Tech Coloproctol. 2006 Jul;10(2):131-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-006-0266-1. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
7
Rectal cancer surgery without mechanical bowel preparation.无需机械肠道准备的直肠癌手术
Br J Surg. 2007 Oct;94(10):1266-71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5524.
8
Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery.是否进行机械性肠道准备?一项择期开放性结肠手术多中心随机试验的结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Aug;48(8):1509-16. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0068-y.
9
Mechanical bowel preparation in colorectal surgery.
Coll Antropol. 2012 Dec;36(4):1343-6.
10
Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial.直肠癌症手术是否需要肠道准备:法国 GRECCAR III 多中心单盲随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2010 Nov;252(5):863-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd8ea9.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Versus Placebo in the Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgeries: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.聚乙二醇与安慰剂用于择期结直肠手术肠道准备的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Mar 23;17(3):e81024. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
A Network Meta-Analysis and GRADE Assessment of the Effect of Preoperative Oral Antibiotics with and Without Mechanical Bowel Preparation on Surgical Site Infection Rate in Colorectal Surgery.术前口服抗生素联合或不联合机械肠道准备对结直肠手术手术部位感染率影响的网状Meta分析及GRADE评估
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jun 23;3(3):e175. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000175. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis.
择期结直肠手术中的机械肠道准备和抗生素:网络荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad040.
4
Effect of preoperative oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation on the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery, and does oral antibiotic regime matter? a bayesian network meta-analysis.术前口服抗生素和机械肠道准备对择期结直肠手术预防手术部位感染的影响,以及口服抗生素方案是否重要?一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 31;38(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04444-3.
5
The role of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics in prevention of anastomotic leakage following restorative resection for primary rectal cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis.术前机械性肠道准备和口服抗生素在原发性直肠癌根治性切除术后预防吻合口漏中的作用——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 15;38(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04416-7.
6
Is There a Role for Mechanical and Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对于接受微创结直肠手术的患者,机械性和口服抗生素肠道准备是否有作用?一项系统评价和Meta分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May;27(5):1011-1025. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05636-6. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
7
Surgical approaches to colonic and rectal anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠吻合术的外科入路:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 23;38(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04328-6.
8
Therapy Used to Promote Disease Remission Targeting Gut Dysbiosis, in UC Patients with Active Disease.用于促进疾病缓解的疗法,针对患有活动性疾病的溃疡性结肠炎患者的肠道菌群失调。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 16;11(24):7472. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247472.
9
The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.日本外科感染学会:2018 年胃肠外科部位感染的预防、检测和管理指南。
Surg Today. 2021 Jan;51(1):1-31. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02181-6. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol.前瞻性随机对照试验,使用 REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) 平台和国家手术质量改进计划 (NSQIP),比较择期结肠手术中不准备与单独术前口服抗生素预防手术部位感染率的效果:方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 9;10(7):e036866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866.