Diop Amadou, Maurel Nathalie, Chang Vivian K, Kany Jean, Duranthon Louis-Denis, Grimberg Jean
Equipe Biomécanique et Remodelage Osseux, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, France.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Nov;26(9):904-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.05.011.
The fixation of the tendon to the bone remains a challenging problem in the latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable cuff tears and can lead to unsatisfactory results. A new arthroscopic method of tendon to bone fixation using an interference screw has been developed and the purpose of this study was to compare its biomechanical properties to the ones of a standard fixation technique with anchors.
Six paired fresh frozen cadaveric human humeri were used. The freed latissimus dorsi tendon was randomly fixed to the humeral head with anchors or with interference screw after a tubularization procedure. Testing consisted to apply 200 cycles of tensile load on the latissimus dorsi tendon with maximal loads of 30 N and 60 N, followed by a load to failure test. The stiffness, displacements after cyclic loadings, ultimate load to failure, and site of failure were analysed.
The stiffness was statistically higher for the tendons fixed with interference screws than for the ones fixed with anchors for both 30 N and 60 N loadings. Likewise, the relative bone/tendon displacements after cyclic loadings were lower with interference screws compared to anchors. Load to failure revealed no statistical difference between the two techniques.
Compared to the standard anchor fixation, the interference screw fixation technique presents higher or similar biomechanical performance. These results should be completed by further biomechanical and clinical trials to confirm the interest of this new technique as an alternative in clinical use.
在背阔肌肌腱转位修复不可修复的肩袖撕裂时,肌腱与骨的固定仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题,并且可能导致不理想的结果。一种使用干涉螺钉进行肌腱与骨固定的新关节镜技术已被开发出来,本研究的目的是将其生物力学性能与标准的锚钉固定技术进行比较。
使用六对新鲜冷冻的人体肱骨。游离的背阔肌肌腱在进行管状化处理后,随机用锚钉或干涉螺钉固定于肱骨头。测试包括对背阔肌肌腱施加200个周期的拉伸负荷,最大负荷分别为30 N和60 N,随后进行破坏负荷试验。分析了刚度、循环加载后的位移、极限破坏负荷和破坏部位。
对于30 N和60 N的负荷,用干涉螺钉固定的肌腱的刚度在统计学上高于用锚钉固定的肌腱。同样,与锚钉相比,干涉螺钉在循环加载后的相对骨/肌腱位移更低。破坏负荷显示两种技术之间没有统计学差异。
与标准的锚钉固定相比,干涉螺钉固定技术具有更高或相似的生物力学性能。这些结果应通过进一步的生物力学和临床试验来完善,以证实这种新技术作为临床替代方法的价值。