Integrated Physiology Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular and Neuronal Remodelling, LIGHT, University of Leeds, UK.
J Physiol. 2011 Aug 15;589(Pt 16):4041-52. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.210732. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
In contrast to the reflex vasodilatation occurring in response to stimulation of baroreceptors in the aortic arch, carotid sinuses and coronary arteries, stimulation of receptors in the wall of pulmonary arteries results in reflex systemic vasoconstriction. It is rare for interventions to activate only one reflexogenic region, therefore we investigated how these two types of reflexes interact. In anaesthetized dogs connected to cardiopulmonary bypass, reflexogenic areas of the carotid sinuses, aortic arch and coronary arteries and the pulmonary artery were subjected to independently controlled pressures. Systemic perfusion pressure (SPP) measured in the descending aorta (constant flow) provided an index of systemic vascular resistance. In other experiments, sympathetic efferent neural activity was recorded in fibres dissected from the renal nerve (RSNA). Physiological increases in pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) induced significant increases in SPP (+39.1 ± 10.4 mmHg) and RSNA (+17.6 ± 2.2 impulses s(−1)) whereas increases in carotid sinus pressure (CSP) induced significant decreases in SPP (−42.6 ± 10.8 mmHg) and RSNA (−42.8 ± 18.2 impulses s(−1)) (P < 0.05 for each comparison; paired t test). To examine possible interactions, PAP was changed at different levels of CSP in both studies. With CSP controlled at 124 ± 2 mmHg, the threshold, 'set point' and saturation pressures of the PAP–SPP relationship were higher than those with CSP at 60 ± 1 mmHg; this rightward shift was associated with a significant decrease in the reflex gain. Similarly, increasing CSP produced a rightward shift of the PAP–RSNA relationship, although the effect on reflex gain was inconsistent. Furthermore, the responses to changes in CSP were influenced by setting PAP at different levels; increasing the level of PAP from 5 ± 1 to 33 ± 3 mmHg significantly increased the set point and threshold pressures of the CSP–SPP relationship; the reflex gain was not affected. These results indicate the existence of interaction between pulmonary arterial and carotid sinus baroreceptor reflexes; physiological and pathological states that alter the stimulus to one may alter the reflex responses from the other.
与主动脉弓、颈动脉窦和冠状动脉的压力感受器反射性血管扩张相反,刺激肺动脉壁的受体导致反射性全身血管收缩。干预措施很少只激活一个反射区,因此我们研究了这两种反射如何相互作用。在连接心肺旁路的麻醉犬中,颈动脉窦、主动脉弓和冠状动脉以及肺动脉的反射区接受独立控制的压力。降主动脉(恒流)中测量的全身灌注压(SPP)提供全身血管阻力的指数。在其他实验中,从肾神经(RSNA)分离的纤维中记录交感传出神经活动。肺内动脉压(PAP)的生理升高引起 SPP 的显著增加(+39.1 ± 10.4 mmHg)和 RSNA(+17.6 ± 2.2 脉冲 s(-1)),而颈动脉窦压(CSP)的升高引起 SPP 的显著降低(-42.6 ± 10.8 mmHg)和 RSNA(-42.8 ± 18.2 脉冲 s(-1))(每种比较均为 P < 0.05;配对 t 检验)。为了检查可能的相互作用,在两项研究中,在不同的 CSP 水平下改变 PAP。当 CSP 控制在 124 ± 2 mmHg 时,PAP-SPP 关系的阈值、“设定点”和饱和度压力高于 CSP 控制在 60 ± 1 mmHg 时;这种右移与反射增益的显著降低有关。同样,增加 CSP 导致 PAP-RSNA 关系向右移动,尽管对反射增益的影响不一致。此外,CSP 变化的反应受到设定 PAP 水平的影响;将 PAP 水平从 5 ± 1 增加到 33 ± 3 mmHg 显著增加了 CSP-SPP 关系的设定点和阈值压力;反射增益不受影响。这些结果表明肺动脉和颈动脉窦压力感受器反射之间存在相互作用;改变一个刺激的生理和病理状态可能会改变另一个反射的反应。