Rooney R J, Raychaudhuri P, Nevins J R
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;10(10):5138-49. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.10.5138-5149.1990.
Previous experiments have identified an element in the adenovirus E4 promoter that is critical for E1A-dependent trans activation and that can confer inducibility to a heterologous promoter. This DNA element is a recognition site for multiple nuclear factors, including ATF, which is likely a family of DNA-binding factors with similar DNA recognition properties. However, ATF activity was found not to be altered in any demonstrable way as a result of adenovirus infection. In contrast, another factor that recognizes this element, termed E4F, was found at only very low levels in uninfected cells but was increased markedly upon adenovirus infection, as measured in DNA-binding assays. Although both the ATF activity and the E4F activity recognized and bound to the same two sites in the E4 promoter, they differed in their sequence recognition of these sites. Furthermore, E4F bound only to a small subset of the ATF recognition sites; for instance, E4F did not recognize the ATF sites in the E2 or E3 promoters. Various E4F and ATF binding sites were inserted into an expression vector and tested by cotransfection assays for responsiveness to E1A. We found that a sequence capable of binding E4F could confer E1A inducibility. In contrast, a sequence that could bind ATF but not E4F did not confer E1A inducibility. We also found that E4F formed a stable complex with the E4 promoter, whereas the ATF DNA complex was unstable and rapidly dissociated. We conclude that the DNA-binding specificity of E4F as well as the alterations in DNA-binding activity of E4F closely correlates with E1A stimulation of the E4 promoter.
先前的实验已在腺病毒E4启动子中鉴定出一种元件,它对于E1A依赖的反式激活至关重要,并且能够赋予异源启动子可诱导性。该DNA元件是多种核因子的识别位点,包括ATF,它可能是一类具有相似DNA识别特性的DNA结合因子家族。然而,发现腺病毒感染并未以任何可证明的方式改变ATF活性。相反,另一种识别该元件的因子,称为E4F,在未感染的细胞中仅以非常低的水平存在,但在腺病毒感染后显著增加,这在DNA结合试验中得到测量。尽管ATF活性和E4F活性都识别并结合到E4启动子中的相同两个位点,但它们对这些位点的序列识别不同。此外,E4F仅结合ATF识别位点的一小部分;例如,E4F不识别E2或E3启动子中的ATF位点。将各种E4F和ATF结合位点插入表达载体,并通过共转染试验测试其对E1A的反应性。我们发现能够结合E4F的序列可以赋予E1A诱导性。相反,能够结合ATF但不能结合E4F的序列不赋予E1A诱导性。我们还发现E4F与E4启动子形成稳定的复合物,而ATF DNA复合物不稳定且迅速解离。我们得出结论,E4F的DNA结合特异性以及E4F DNA结合活性的改变与E1A对E4启动子的刺激密切相关。