Lee K A, Fink J S, Goodman R H, Green M R
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4390-7. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4390-4397.1989.
The sequence motif CGTCA is critical for binding of a group of cellular transcription factors (ATF, CREB, E4F, and EivF) and for activation of certain E1a-inducible and cyclic AMP (cAMP)-inducible promoters. We have tested different promoter elements containing the CGTCA motif (referred to here as ATF-binding sites) for the ability to function as E1a or cAMP response elements. The adenovirus E4 promoter and the cellular vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) promoter responded differently to E1a and cAMP, demonstrating that the activating potential of ATF-binding sites within these promoters is not equivalent. While particular ATF-binding sites were sufficient for the activity of both the E4 (E1a inducibility) and VIP (cAMP inducibility) enhancers, these two enhancers had contrasting effects on E1a- and cAMP-inducible transcription. Thus, the relationship between E1a- and cAMP-inducible transcription is not simply explained by the action of these two inducers through the same promoter elements.
序列基序CGTCA对于一组细胞转录因子(ATF、CREB、E4F和EivF)的结合以及某些E1a诱导型和环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)诱导型启动子的激活至关重要。我们已经测试了含有CGTCA基序(此处称为ATF结合位点)的不同启动子元件作为E1a或cAMP反应元件的功能能力。腺病毒E4启动子和细胞血管活性肠肽(VIP)启动子对E1a和cAMP的反应不同,表明这些启动子内ATF结合位点的激活潜力并不相同。虽然特定的ATF结合位点对于E4(E1a诱导性)和VIP(cAMP诱导性)增强子的活性都足够,但这两个增强子对E1a和cAMP诱导的转录有相反的影响。因此,E1a和cAMP诱导转录之间的关系不能简单地通过这两种诱导剂通过相同启动子元件的作用来解释。