Suppr超能文献

现代技术辅助与传统扁桃体切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Modern technology-assisted vs conventional tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Alexiou Vangelis G, Salazar-Salvia Mary Sheryll, Jervis Paul N, Falagas Matthew E

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Northampton General Hospital, England.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;137(6):558-70. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.93.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence regarding modern technology-assisted tonsillectomy pertaining to operative time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and other outcomes.

DESIGN

A systematic search for randomized controlled trials comparing total tonsillectomies performed using vessel sealing systems (VSS), Harmonic Scalpel (HS), or radiofrequency ablation (ie, Coblation) with the conventional technique of cold steel and/or electrocautery dissection (CS/EC). Estimation of odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), weighted mean differences (WMD), or standardized mean difference (SMD), as appropriate.

PATIENTS

Thirty-three randomized controlled trials studying a total of 3139 patients were included in this meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Operative time, perioperative and postoperative bleeding, and postoperative pain.

RESULTS

For the VSS group compared with the CS/EC group, operative time was significantly shorter (WMD), -4.09 minutes; 95% CI, -7.43 to -0.75 minutes; 760 patients), perioperative bleeding was significantly less (SMD, -1.67; -2.80 to -0.53; 355 patients), and postoperative bleeding was significantly less (odds ratio, 0.28; 0.13 to 0.61; 792 patients). Pain on the first and seventh postoperative days was significantly less in the VSS group (SMD, -1.73; 95% CI, -3.07 to -0.39; 740 patients; and SMD, -1.46; -2.35 to -0.57; 684 patients; respectively). For the HS group compared with the CS/EC group, the only studied outcome that differed significantly was perioperative bleeding, which was significantly less in the HS group (WMD -37.71 mL; 95% CI, -52.98 to -22.43 mL; 535 cases). No difference was noted between the Coblation and CS/EC groups for any of the studied outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

For tonsillectomies, the Coblation and HS techniques do not provide any significant advantage compared with CS/EC. Synthesis of the limited and heterogeneous data regarding VSSs showed a significant benefit in all studied outcomes.

摘要

目的

系统评价有关现代技术辅助扁桃体切除术在手术时间、术中及术后出血、术后疼痛及其他结局方面的证据。

设计

系统检索比较使用血管封闭系统(VSS)、超声刀(HS)或射频消融(即低温等离子体消融)进行全扁桃体切除术与传统冷钢和/或电灼剥离术(CS/EC)的随机对照试验。视情况估计比值比和95%置信区间(CI)、加权平均差(WMD)或标准化平均差(SMD)。

患者

本荟萃分析纳入了33项共研究3139例患者的随机对照试验。

主要结局指标

手术时间、围手术期及术后出血、术后疼痛。

结果

与CS/EC组相比,VSS组手术时间显著缩短(WMD,-4.09分钟;95%CI,-7.43至-0.75分钟;760例患者),围手术期出血显著减少(SMD,-1.67;-2.80至-0.53;355例患者),术后出血也显著减少(比值比,0.28;0.13至0.61;792例患者)。VSS组术后第1天和第7天的疼痛显著减轻(SMD,-1.73;95%CI,-3.07至-0.39;740例患者;以及SMD,-1.46;-2.35至-0.57;684例患者)。与CS/EC组相比,HS组唯一有显著差异的研究结局是围手术期出血,HS组围手术期出血显著减少(WMD -37.71 mL;95%CI,-52.98至-22.43 mL;535例)。在任何研究结局方面,低温等离子体消融组与CS/EC组之间均未发现差异。

结论

对于扁桃体切除术,低温等离子体消融和超声刀技术与CS/EC相比没有任何显著优势。关于VSS的有限且异质性的数据综合显示在所有研究结局方面有显著益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验