Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;48(8):1180-1187. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004385.
Emergency department boarding is the practice of caring for admitted patients in the emergency department after hospital admission, and boarding has been a growing problem in the United States. Boarding of the critically ill has achieved specific attention because of its association with poor clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians convened a Task Force to understand the implications of emergency department boarding of the critically ill. The objective of this article is to review the U.S. literature on (1) the frequency of emergency department boarding among the critically ill, (2) the outcomes associated with critical care patient boarding, and (3) local strategies developed to mitigate the impact of emergency department critical care boarding on patient outcomes.
Review article.
Emergency department-based boarding of the critically ill patient is common, but no nationally representative frequency estimates has been reported. Boarding literature is limited by variation in the definitions used for boarding and variation in the facilities studied (boarding ranges from 2% to 88% of ICU admissions). Prolonged boarding in the emergency department has been associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, and higher mortality. Health systems have developed multiple mitigation strategies to address emergency department boarding of critically ill patients, including emergency department-based interventions, hospital-based interventions, and emergency department-based resuscitation care units.
Emergency department boarding of critically ill patients was common and was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Health systems have generated a number of strategies to mitigate these effects. A definition for emergency department boarding is proposed. Future work should establish formal criteria for analysis and benchmarking of emergency department-based boarding overall, with subsequent efforts focused on developing and reporting innovative strategies that improve clinical outcomes of critically ill patients boarded in the emergency department.
急诊留观是指在患者住院后仍在急诊病房接受治疗的一种做法,在美国,这种情况越来越普遍。由于其与不良临床结局相关,危重症患者的留观问题已受到特别关注。因此,重症医学学会和美国急诊医师学会召集了一个工作组,以了解危重症患者急诊留观的相关影响。本文的目的是回顾美国关于以下方面的文献:(1)危重症患者在急诊留观的频率;(2)与重症监护患者留观相关的结局;(3)为减轻急诊重症监护留观对患者结局的影响而制定的当地策略。
综述文章。
在急诊病房对危重症患者进行留观很常见,但尚未报告全国范围内的频率估计值。留观文献受到留观定义和研究设施的差异的限制(留观范围为 ICU 入院患者的 2%至 88%)。在急诊病房长时间留观与机械通气时间延长、ICU 和住院时间延长以及死亡率升高有关。医疗系统已经开发了多种缓解策略来解决危重症患者在急诊病房的留观问题,包括在急诊病房开展的干预措施、在医院层面开展的干预措施,以及在急诊病房开展的复苏护理单元。
危重症患者在急诊病房留观很常见,且与更差的临床结局相关。医疗系统已经提出了许多缓解这些影响的策略。本文提出了急诊留观的定义。未来的工作应建立用于全面分析和基准测试基于急诊留观的标准,随后的工作应重点开发和报告改善在急诊病房留观的危重症患者临床结局的创新策略。