Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):989-95. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822203d8.
To develop instruments for measuring empathic and sympathetic orientations in patient care and to provide evidence in support of their psychometrics.
Third-year medical students at Jefferson Medical College responded to four clinical vignettes in 2010. For each vignette, students indicated the extent of their agreement with an empathic response (conveying their understanding of patients' concerns) and with a sympathetic response (sharing patients' feelings). The authors calculated, based on students' responses to the clinical vignettes, two measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation. Students also completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI).
Of the 258 students in the class, 201 (78%) responded to all four vignettes and completed the JSE and IRI. The authors confirmed construct validity of the measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation through factor analysis. The empathic orientation was significantly associated with the measure of empathy (as measured by the JSE) but not with measures of sympathy (as measured by specific scales of the IRI). Conversely, sympathetic orientation was significantly associated with measures of sympathy. Thus, these results support the validity of the empathic and sympathetic orientation measures as assessed by four clinical vignettes. Coefficient alphas for the two measures were, respectively, 0.79 and 0.84.
The validated measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation provide research opportunities to enhance the understanding of the contributions of empathy and sympathy to physicians' competence and patient outcomes.
开发用于测量患者护理中同理心和同情心倾向的工具,并提供支持其心理测量学的证据。
2010 年,杰斐逊医学院的三年级医学生对四个临床案例做出了回应。对于每个案例,学生表明他们对同理心反应(传达对患者关切的理解)和同情心反应(分享患者的感受)的同意程度。作者根据学生对临床案例的反应,计算出同理心和同情心倾向的两个衡量标准。学生还完成了杰斐逊同理心量表(JSE)和人际反应指数(IRI)。
在该班级的 258 名学生中,有 201 名(78%)学生对所有四个案例做出了回应,并完成了 JSE 和 IRI。作者通过因子分析确认了同理心和同情心倾向衡量标准的结构有效性。同理心倾向与同理心的衡量标准(由 JSE 衡量)显著相关,但与 IRI 的同情特定量表衡量的同情无关。相反,同情心倾向与同情的衡量标准显著相关。因此,这些结果支持了通过四个临床案例评估的同理心和同情心倾向衡量标准的有效性。两个衡量标准的系数 alpha 分别为 0.79 和 0.84。
经验证的同理心和同情心倾向衡量标准为研究提供了机会,以增强对同理心和同情心对医生能力和患者结果的贡献的理解。