Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Anna-von-Borries-Str 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Feb;20(2):308-14. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1584-z. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
A secure tibial press-fit technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions is an interesting technique because no hardware is necessary. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, a few press-fit procedures have been published. Up to the present point, no biomechanical data exist for a tibial press-fit posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to characterize a press-fit procedure for PCL reconstruction that is biomechanically equivalent to an interference screw fixation.
Quadriceps and hamstring tendons of 20 human cadavers (age: 49.2 ± 18.5 years) were used. A press-fit fixation with a knot in the semitendinosus tendon (K) and a quadriceps tendon bone block graft (Q) were compared to an interference screw fixation (I) in 30 porcine femora. In each group, nine constructs were cyclically stretched and then loaded until failure. Maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation during failure testing and cyclical loading were investigated.
The maximum load to failure was 518 ± 157 N (387-650 N) for the (K) group, 558 ± 119 N (466-650 N) for the (I) group, and 620 ± 102 N (541-699 N) for the (Q) group. The stiffness was 55 ± 27 N/mm (18-89 N/mm) for the (K) group, 117 ± 62 N/mm (69-165 N/mm) for the (I) group, and 65 ± 21 N/mm (49-82 N/mm) for the (Q) group. The stiffness of the (I) group was significantly larger (P = 0.01). The elongation during cyclical loading was significantly larger for all groups from the 1st to the 5th cycle compared to the elongation in between the 5th to the 20th cycle (P < 0.03).
All techniques exhibited larger elongation during initial loading. Load to failure and stiffness was significantly different between the fixations. The Q fixation showed equal biomechanical properties compared to a pure tendon fixation (I) with an interference screw. All three fixation techniques that were investigated exhibit comparable biomechanical properties. Preconditioning of the constructs is critical. Clinical trials have to investigate the biological effectiveness of these fixation techniques.
在后交叉韧带重建中使用胫骨压配合技术是一种很有趣的技术,因为不需要使用任何硬件。对于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建,已经发表了一些压配合程序。到目前为止,还没有关于胫骨压配合后交叉韧带(PCL)重建的生物力学数据。本研究的目的是描述一种与干扰螺钉固定生物力学等效的 PCL 重建压配合程序。
使用 20 具人体尸体的股四头肌和腘绳肌腱(年龄:49.2±18.5 岁)。在 30 个猪股骨中,比较了半腱肌腱结(K)和股四头肌肌腱骨块移植物(Q)的压配合固定与干扰螺钉固定(I)。在每组中,九个构建体进行循环拉伸,然后加载直至失效。研究了失效测试和循环加载过程中的最大失效载荷、刚度和伸长率。
(K)组的最大失效载荷为 518±157N(387-650N),(I)组为 558±119N(466-650N),(Q)组为 620±102N(541-699N)。(K)组的刚度为 55±27N/mm(18-89N/mm),(I)组为 117±62N/mm(69-165N/mm),(Q)组为 65±21N/mm(49-82N/mm)。(I)组的刚度显著较大(P=0.01)。与第 5 至 20 次循环之间的伸长率相比,所有组在第 1 至第 5 次循环期间的伸长率均显著较大(P<0.03)。
所有技术在初始加载时都表现出较大的伸长率。失效载荷和刚度在固定之间有显著差异。Q 固定与纯肌腱固定(I)和干扰螺钉相比具有相等的生物力学性能。所研究的三种固定技术都具有可比的生物力学性能。构建体的预条件是关键。临床试验必须研究这些固定技术的生物学效果。