University of York, York, UK.
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
The World Health Report 2000 proposed three fundamental goals for health systems encompassing population health, health care finance and health systems responsiveness. The goals incorporate both an efficiency and equity dimension. While inequalities in population health and health care finance have motivated two important strands of research, inequalities in responsiveness have received less attention in health economics. This paper examines inequality and polarisation in responsiveness, bridging this gap in the literature and contributing towards an integrated analysis of health systems performance. It uses data from the World Health Survey to measure and compare inequalities in responsiveness across 25 European countries. In order to respect the inherently ordinal nature of the responsiveness data, median-based measures of inequality and polarisation are employed. The results suggest that, in the face of wide differences in the health systems analysed, there exists large variability in inequality in responsiveness across countries.
《2000 年世界卫生报告》为卫生系统提出了涵盖人群健康、卫生保健筹资和卫生系统反应性的三个基本目标。这些目标既包含效率维度,也包含公平维度。虽然人群健康和卫生保健筹资方面的不平等现象激发了两条重要的研究线索,但在卫生经济学中,反应性方面的不平等现象却较少受到关注。本文考察了反应性方面的不平等和两极分化现象,填补了文献中的这一空白,并有助于对卫生系统绩效进行综合分析。本文使用世界卫生调查的数据,衡量和比较了 25 个欧洲国家的反应性不平等程度。为了尊重反应性数据固有的有序性质,采用了基于中位数的不平等和两极分化程度衡量方法。研究结果表明,尽管所分析的卫生系统之间存在很大差异,但各国的反应性不平等程度存在很大差异。