Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Nov;4(11):1873-83. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0218. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is purportedly related to risk of developing colorectal cancer; however, the association of MetS, as defined according to recent international criteria, and colorectal cancer has not been yet evaluated. In particular, it remains unclear to what extent the MetS components individually account for such an association. We addressed these issues in a nested case-control study that included 1,093 incident cases matched (1:1) to controls by using incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% CIs. MetS was defined according to the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP/ATPIII), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and the 2009 harmonized definition. Among individual components, abdominal obesity (RR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.16-1.96) was associated with colon cancer, whereas abnormal glucose metabolism was associated with both colon (RR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.57-2.68) and rectal cancer (RR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.45-2.96). MetS, as defined by each of the definitions, was similarly associated with colon cancer (e.g., RR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.47-2.42 for MetS by NCEP/ATPIII), whereas MetS by NCEP/ATPIII, but not IDF or harmonized definition, was associated with rectal cancer (RR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.02-2.06). Overall, these associations were stronger in women than in men. However, the association between MetS and colorectal cancer was accounted for by abdominal obesity and abnormal glucose metabolism such that MetS did not provide risk information beyond these components (likelihood ratio test P = 0.10 for MetS by NCEP/ATPIII). These data suggest that simple assessment of abnormal glucose metabolism and/or abdominal obesity to identify individuals at colorectal cancer risk may have higher clinical utility than applying more complex MetS definitions.
代谢综合征(MetS)据称与结直肠癌发病风险相关;然而,根据最近的国际标准定义的 MetS 与结直肠癌的相关性尚未得到评估。特别是,MetS 各组分在多大程度上单独导致这种相关性尚不清楚。我们在一项巢式病例对照研究中解决了这些问题,该研究通过发病率密度抽样,将 1093 例新发病例与对照进行了 1:1 匹配。使用条件逻辑回归来估计相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。MetS 根据国家胆固醇教育计划/成人治疗专家组 III(NCEP/ATPIII)、国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)和 2009 年协调定义的标准进行定义。在个体成分中,腹部肥胖(RR=1.51;95%CI:1.16-1.96)与结肠癌相关,而异常葡萄糖代谢与结肠癌(RR=2.05;95%CI:1.57-2.68)和直肠癌(RR=2.07;95%CI:1.45-2.96)均相关。根据每种定义定义的 MetS 与结肠癌具有相似的相关性(例如,NCEP/ATPIII 定义的 MetS 与结肠癌的 RR=1.91;95%CI:1.47-2.42),而 NCEP/ATPIII 定义的 MetS 与直肠癌相关(RR=1.45;95%CI:1.02-2.06),而 IDF 或协调定义则没有。总体而言,这些相关性在女性中强于男性。然而,MetS 与结直肠癌之间的关联归因于腹部肥胖和异常葡萄糖代谢,因此 MetS 并没有提供超出这些成分的风险信息(NCEP/ATPIII 的 MetS 的似然比检验 P=0.10)。这些数据表明,简单评估异常葡萄糖代谢和/或腹部肥胖以识别结直肠癌风险个体可能比应用更复杂的 MetS 定义具有更高的临床实用性。