• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing cessation interventions for the social and community service setting: a qualitative study of barriers to quitting among disadvantaged Australian smokers.为社会和社区服务环境制定戒烟干预措施:一项针对澳大利亚劣势烟民戒烟障碍的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 24;11:493. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-493.
2
A survey of smoking prevalence and interest in quitting among social and community service organisation clients in Australia: a unique opportunity for reaching the disadvantaged.澳大利亚社会和社区服务组织客户的吸烟流行率和戒烟意愿调查:为弱势群体提供服务的独特机会。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 26;11:827. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-827.
3
Can social and community service organisations embrace tobacco control for their disadvantaged clients?社会和社区服务组织能否为其弱势客户开展控烟工作?
Health Promot J Austr. 2012 Dec;23(3):188-93. doi: 10.1071/he12188.
4
Delivering smoking cessation support to disadvantaged groups: a qualitative study of the potential of community welfare organizations.为弱势群体提供戒烟支持:社区福利组织潜力的定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec;25(6):979-90. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq051. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
5
"I'm not strong enough; I'm not good enough. I can't do this, I'm failing"- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers' experiences with accesssing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support.“我不够强大;我不够好。我做不到,我失败了”——一项关于社会经济地位较低的吸烟者获得戒烟支持的体验以及替代性基于技术的支持的作用的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Nov 13;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0689-5.
6
A qualitative study about smoking cessation with clients of community service organisations that work with disadvantaged families.一项关于与服务弱势家庭的社区服务组织的客户一起戒烟的定性研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Aug;22(2):153-5. doi: 10.1071/he11153.
7
The forgotten smoker: a qualitative study of attitudes towards smoking, quitting, and tobacco control policies among continuing smokers.被遗忘的吸烟者:一项关于继续吸烟者对吸烟、戒烟和烟草控制政策态度的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 3;13:432. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-432.
8
Encouraging smoking cessation among disadvantaged groups: a qualitative study of the financial aspects of cessation.鼓励弱势群体戒烟:一项关于戒烟经济方面的定性研究。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 Jul;30(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00248.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
9
Comparing socially disadvantaged smokers who agree and decline to participate in a randomised smoking cessation trial.比较同意和拒绝参与随机戒烟试验的社会弱势吸烟者。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 14;5(9):e008419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008419.
10
Wanting to attend isn't just wanting to quit: why some disadvantaged smokers regularly attend smoking cessation behavioural therapy while others do not: a qualitative study.想去参加并非仅仅意味着想要戒烟:为何一些处于不利地位的吸烟者会定期参加戒烟行为疗法而另一些人却不会:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 7;14:695. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-695.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study on people with opioid use disorders' perspectives on smoking and smoking cessation interventions.一项关于阿片类药物使用障碍患者对吸烟及戒烟干预措施看法的定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 10;14:1185338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1185338. eCollection 2023.
2
A risk perception model to promote smoking cessation among adult current smokers: Application of a community-based smoking cessation intervention.一种促进成年现吸烟者戒烟的风险认知模型:基于社区的戒烟干预措施的应用。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2022 Oct 13;8:36. doi: 10.18332/tpc/152888. eCollection 2022.
3
What is behind the lifestyle risk factors for head and neck cancer?头颈癌的生活方式风险因素背后是什么?
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:960638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960638. eCollection 2022.
4
A process evaluation of 'We Can Quit': a community-based smoking cessation intervention targeting women from areas of socio-disadvantage in Ireland.“我们可以戒烟”:针对爱尔兰社会劣势地区女性的基于社区的戒烟干预措施的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):1528. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13957-5.
5
Exploring Support Provided by Community Managed Organisations to Address Health Risk Behaviours Associated with Chronic Disease among People with Mental Health Conditions: A Qualitative Study with Organisational Leaders.探索社区管理组织提供的支持,以解决心理健康状况患者中与慢性病相关的健康风险行为:一项针对组织领导者的定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 2;19(9):5533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095533.
6
Effect of COVID-19 on mental health among the young population in Lebanon.黎巴嫩青年群体中 COVID-19 对心理健康的影响。
Encephale. 2022 Aug;48(4):371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Smoking cessation using preference-based tools among socially disadvantaged smokers: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial.基于偏好的工具在社会劣势吸烟者中戒烟的效果:一项实用、多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e048859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048859.
8
Smoking cessation using preference-based tools: a mixed method pilot study of a novel intervention among smokers with low socioeconomic position.基于偏好的工具戒烟:一项针对社会经济地位较低的吸烟者的新型干预措施的混合方法试点研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Jun 30;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00254-6.
9
Inequalities, harm reduction and non-combustible nicotine products: a meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence.不平等、减少伤害和非燃烧型尼古丁产品:定性证据的元民族志学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09083-9.
10
Parents' Self-efficacy for Tobacco Exposure Protection and Smoking Abstinence Mediate Treatment Effects on Child Cotinine at 12-Month Follow-up: Mediation Results from the Kids Safe and Smokefree Trial.家长对烟草暴露防护和戒烟的自我效能在 12 个月随访时中介了治疗对儿童可替宁的影响:来自 Kids Safe and Smokefree 试验的中介结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(11):1981-1988. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz175.

本文引用的文献

1
What is a planning model? An introduction to PRECEDE-PROCEED.什么是规划模式?PRECEDE-PROCEED 简介。
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00235.x.
2
Additive and subtractive resilience strategies as enablers of biographical reinvention: a qualitative study of ex-smokers and never-smokers.加法和减法弹性策略作为传记重塑的推动者:对戒烟者和从不吸烟者的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.023. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
3
RCT of a client-centred, caseworker-delivered smoking cessation intervention for a socially disadvantaged population.以客户为中心、个案工作者提供的针对社会弱势群体的戒烟干预的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 31;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-70.
4
The importance of resilience and stress to maintaining smoking abstinence and cessation: a qualitative study in Australia with people diagnosed with depression.韧性和压力对于维持戒烟和戒断的重要性:澳大利亚一项针对被诊断患有抑郁症的人群的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 May;19(3):299-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00973.x. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
5
Integrating smoking care in community welfare agencies to reach disadvantaged people: Findings from the Smoking Matters Project.将吸烟护理融入社区福利机构以覆盖弱势群体:来自“吸烟问题项目”的研究结果。
Health Promot J Austr. 2010 Dec;21(3):176-82. doi: 10.1071/he10176.
6
Delivering smoking cessation support to disadvantaged groups: a qualitative study of the potential of community welfare organizations.为弱势群体提供戒烟支持:社区福利组织潜力的定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec;25(6):979-90. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq051. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
7
Cigarette smoking and advice to quit in a national sample of homeless adults.在全国无家可归的成年人群体中进行的吸烟情况调查及戒烟建议。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Aug;39(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.024.
8
Closing tobacco-related disparities: Using community organizations to increase consumer demand.缩小与烟草相关的差距:利用社区组织提高消费者需求。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.015.
9
Smokers with financial stress are more likely to want to quit but less likely to try or succeed: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.有经济压力的吸烟者更有可能想要戒烟,但尝试或成功的可能性更小:来自国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查的结果。
Addiction. 2009 Aug;104(8):1382-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02599.x. Epub 2009 May 12.
10
Improving access to smoking cessation services for disadvantaged groups: a systematic review.改善弱势群体获得戒烟服务的机会:一项系统评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2009 Jun;31(2):258-77. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp008. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

为社会和社区服务环境制定戒烟干预措施:一项针对澳大利亚劣势烟民戒烟障碍的定性研究。

Developing cessation interventions for the social and community service setting: a qualitative study of barriers to quitting among disadvantaged Australian smokers.

机构信息

Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology, Cancer Council New South Wales, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 24;11:493. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-493.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-493
PMID:21699730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3135539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking rates remain unacceptably high among individuals who are socially disadvantaged. Social and community service organisations (SCSO) are increasingly interested in providing smoking cessation support to clients, however little is known about the best way to assist disadvantaged smokers to quit in this setting. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to quitting within the conceptual framework of the PRECEDE model to identify possible interventions appropriate to the social and community service setting.

METHODS

Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with clients attending five community welfare organisations located in New South Wales, Australia. Thirty-two clients participated in six focus groups. A discussion guide was used to explore the barriers and facilitators to smoking and smoking cessation including: current smoking behaviour, motivation to quit, past quit attempts, barriers to quitting and preferences for cessation support. Focus groups were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Participants were current smokers and most expressed a desire to quit. Factors predisposing continued smoking included perceived benefits of smoking for stress relief, doubting of ability to quit, fear of gaining weight, and poor knowledge and scepticism about available quit support. The high cost of nicotine replacement therapy was a barrier to its use. Continual exposure to smoking in personal relationships and in the community reinforced smoking. Participants expressed a strong preference for personalised quit support.

CONCLUSIONS

Disadvantaged smokers in Australia express a desire to quit smoking, but find quitting difficult for a number of reasons. SCSOs may have a role in providing information about the availability of quit support, engaging disadvantaged smokers with available quit support, and providing personalised, ongoing support.

摘要

背景

在社会弱势群体中,吸烟率仍然高得令人无法接受。社会和社区服务组织(SCSO)越来越有兴趣为客户提供戒烟支持,但对于如何在这种环境下帮助弱势吸烟者戒烟,知之甚少。本研究旨在根据 PRECEDE 模型的概念框架探索戒烟的障碍和促进因素,以确定适合社会和社区服务环境的可能干预措施。

方法

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的五个社区福利组织中,对参加的客户进行了半结构化焦点小组讨论。32 名客户参加了六个焦点小组。使用讨论指南探讨了吸烟和戒烟的障碍和促进因素,包括:当前吸烟行为、戒烟动机、过去戒烟尝试、戒烟障碍和戒烟支持偏好。对焦点小组进行了录音、转录,并使用主题分析技术进行了分析。

结果

参与者是当前吸烟者,大多数人表示希望戒烟。继续吸烟的促成因素包括吸烟缓解压力的好处、怀疑戒烟能力、担心体重增加、以及对可用戒烟支持的知识不足和怀疑。尼古丁替代疗法的高成本是其使用的障碍。在人际关系和社区中持续接触吸烟强化了吸烟行为。参与者强烈希望获得个性化的戒烟支持。

结论

澳大利亚的弱势吸烟者表示希望戒烟,但由于多种原因,他们发现戒烟困难。SCSO 可以在提供有关戒烟支持的可用性信息、让弱势吸烟者接触可用的戒烟支持以及提供个性化、持续的支持方面发挥作用。