Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2011 Oct;51(4):528-39. doi: 10.1093/icb/icr062. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
Animal behavior is unique in influencing both components of the process of transmission of disease: exposure to infectious agents, and susceptibility to infection once exposed. To date, the influence of behavior on exposure versus susceptibility has largely been considered separately. Here, we ask whether these two key mechanisms act in concert in natural populations, whereby individuals who are most exposed to infectious agents or have the most contact with conspecifics are also the most susceptible or infectious. We propose three mechanisms that can generate covariation between these two key elements of the transmission of disease within and among hosts, and we provide empirical examples of each. We then use a mathematical model to examine the effect of this covariation on the dynamics of disease at the population level. First, we show that the empirical mechanisms generating covariation between behavioral and physiological components of disease transmission are widespread and include endocrine mediators of behavior, mate choice, group size, sickness behaviors, and behavioral avoidance of infectious conspecifics. The diversity of these empirical mechanisms underscores the potential importance and breadth of covariation in the disease process. Second, we show mathematically that the variability in hosts' exposure to infectious agents and susceptibility or infectiousness, and how tightly they are coupled, strongly influences the ability of a disease to invade a host population. Overall, we propose that covariation between behavioral and physiological components of transmission is likely widespread in natural populations, and can have important consequences for the dynamics of disease at the population level as well as for our understanding of sexual selection, social behavior, and animal communication.
接触感染源和接触后易感性。迄今为止,行为对暴露和易感性的影响在很大程度上是分开考虑的。在这里,我们询问这两个关键机制是否在自然种群中协同作用,即最易接触感染源或与同种个体接触最多的个体也最易感染或具有传染性。我们提出了三种机制,可以在宿主内部和之间产生疾病传播的这两个关键要素之间的协同作用,并提供了每种机制的实证例子。然后,我们使用数学模型来研究这种协同作用对种群水平疾病动态的影响。首先,我们表明,导致疾病传播的行为和生理成分之间协同作用的经验机制是广泛存在的,包括行为的内分泌介质、配偶选择、群体大小、疾病行为和对传染性同种个体的行为回避。这些经验机制的多样性突显了疾病过程中协同作用的潜在重要性和广度。其次,我们从数学上表明,宿主接触感染源和易感性或传染性的变异性,以及它们之间的耦合紧密程度,强烈影响疾病入侵宿主种群的能力。总体而言,我们提出,在自然种群中,传播的行为和生理成分之间的协同作用可能很普遍,并可能对种群水平疾病的动态以及对我们对性选择、社会行为和动物通讯的理解产生重要影响。