Adelman James S, Hawley Dana M
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, 339 Science Hall II, 2310 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, 1405 Perry St. Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States.
Horm Behav. 2017 Feb;88:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
Infected organisms can resist or tolerate infection, with tolerance of infection defined as minimizing per-parasite reductions in fitness. Although tolerance is well studied in plants, researchers have only begun to probe the mechanisms and transmission consequences of tolerance in animals. Here we suggest that research on tolerance in animals would benefit from explicitly incorporating behavior as a component of tolerance, given the importance of behavior for host fitness and parasite transmission. We propose two distinct manifestations of tolerance in animals: tissue-specific tolerance, which minimizes fitness losses due to tissue damage during infection, and behavioral tolerance, which minimizes fitness losses by maintaining normal, fitness-enhancing behaviors during infection. Here we briefly review one set of potential immune mechanisms underlying both responses in vertebrate animals: inflammation and its associated signaling molecules. Inflammatory responses, including broadly effective resistance mechanisms like the production of reactive oxygen species, can incur severe costs in terms of damage to a host's own tissues, thereby reducing tissue-specific tolerance. In addition, signaling molecules involved in these responses facilitate stereotypical behavioral changes during infection, which include lethargy and anorexia, reducing normal behaviors and behavioral tolerance. We consider how tissue-specific and behavioral tolerance may vary independently or in conjunction and outline potential consequences of such covariation for the transmission of infectious diseases. We put forward the distinction between tissue-specific and behavioral tolerance not as a definitive framework, but to help stimulate and broaden future research by considering animal behavior as intimately linked to the mechanisms and consequences of tolerance in animals.
受感染的生物体可以抵抗或耐受感染,感染耐受被定义为将每个寄生虫导致的适合度降低最小化。虽然植物中的感染耐受已得到充分研究,但研究人员才刚刚开始探究动物中感染耐受的机制及其传播后果。鉴于行为对宿主适合度和寄生虫传播的重要性,我们认为动物感染耐受的研究将受益于明确地将行为纳入耐受的组成部分。我们提出动物中耐受的两种不同表现形式:组织特异性耐受,它将感染期间因组织损伤导致的适合度损失最小化;行为耐受,它通过在感染期间维持正常的、提高适合度的行为来将适合度损失最小化。在这里,我们简要回顾脊椎动物中这两种反应背后的一组潜在免疫机制:炎症及其相关信号分子。炎症反应,包括产生活性氧等广泛有效的抵抗机制,可能会对宿主自身组织造成严重损害,从而降低组织特异性耐受。此外,参与这些反应的信号分子会促进感染期间刻板的行为变化,包括嗜睡和厌食,减少正常行为和行为耐受。我们考虑组织特异性耐受和行为耐受如何独立或共同变化,并概述这种协变对传染病传播的潜在后果。我们提出组织特异性耐受和行为耐受之间的区别,并非作为一个确定的框架,而是为了通过将动物行为视为与动物耐受的机制和后果密切相关,来帮助激发和拓宽未来的研究。