Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring & Reference Laboratory, HPA Microbiology Services-Colindale, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW95EQ, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Sep;66(9):1941-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr262. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
The dwindling supply of new antibiotics largely reflects regulatory and commercial challenges, but also a failure of discovery. In the 1990s the pharmaceutical industry abandoned its classical ways of seeking antibiotics and instead adopted a strategy that combined genomics with high-throughput screening of existing compound libraries. Too much emphasis was placed on identifying targets and molecules that bound to them, and too little emphasis was placed on the ability of these molecules to permeate bacteria, evade efflux and avoid mutational resistance; moreover, the compound libraries were systematically biased against antibiotics. The sorry result is that no antibiotic found by this strategy has yet entered clinical use and many major pharmaceutical companies have abandoned antibiotic discovery. Although a raft of start-up companies-variously financed by venture capital, charity or public money--are now finding new antibiotic compounds (some of them very promising in vitro or in early trials), their development through Phase III depends on financial commitments from large pharmaceutical companies, where the discouraging regulatory environment and the poor likely return on investment remain paramount issues.
新型抗生素的供应日益减少,主要反映了监管和商业方面的挑战,但也反映了发现方面的失败。20 世纪 90 年代,制药行业放弃了传统的抗生素研发方法,转而采用一种将基因组学与现有化合物库的高通量筛选相结合的策略。该策略过于强调确定与抗生素结合的靶点和分子,而对这些分子穿透细菌、逃避外排和避免突变耐药的能力重视不足;此外,化合物库系统地偏向于非抗生素类药物。令人遗憾的是,这一策略发现的抗生素尚未进入临床应用,许多大型制药公司已放弃了抗生素研发。虽然一大批初创公司——通过风险投资、慈善或公共资金等多种方式筹集资金——正在发现新的抗生素化合物(其中一些在体外或早期试验中非常有前景),但要通过第三阶段的开发,还得依靠大型制药公司的资金承诺,而令人沮丧的监管环境和投资回报不佳仍是主要问题。