Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Dallas, Texas From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):305-310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.
As the name suggests, evidence-based medicine (EBM), is about finding evidence and using that evidence to make clinical decisions. A cornerstone of EBM is the hierarchical system of classifying evidence. This hierarchy is known as the levels of evidence. Physicians are encouraged to find the highest level of evidence to answer clinical questions. Several papers published in Plastic Surgery journals concerning EBM topics have touched on this subject. Specifically, previous papers have discussed the lack of higher level evidence in PRS and need to improve the evidence published in the journal. Before that can be accomplished, it is important to understand the history behind the levels and how they should be interpreted. This paper will focus on the origin of levels of evidence, their relevance to the EBM movement and the implications for the field of plastic surgery as well as the everyday practice of plastic surgery.
顾名思义,循证医学(EBM)是关于寻找证据并利用这些证据做出临床决策的。EBM 的一个基石是对证据进行分类的层次系统。这个层次结构被称为证据水平。鼓励医生寻找最高级别的证据来回答临床问题。整形外科杂志上发表的几篇关于循证医学主题的论文都涉及到了这个主题。具体来说,之前的论文讨论了 PRS 中缺乏更高水平的证据,并需要改进杂志上发表的证据。在这一点得到实现之前,了解这些层次结构的历史以及如何解释它们非常重要。本文将重点介绍证据水平的起源、它们与循证医学运动的相关性,以及对整形外科学领域和整形外科日常实践的影响。