Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):133-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254cde.
To compare perimacular ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters between patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
Participants, consecutively enrolled from January 2009 to June 2009, underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging with RTVue-100 (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters, and GCC parameters were acquired. Mean measurements of ONH, RNFL, and GCC parameters among the normal, NTG, and POAG groups were compared using analysis of variance. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the ability of each parameter to detect glaucomatous changes.
Fifty-eight normal controls, 51 patients with NTG, and 52 patients with POAG were included. Mean measurements of ONH parameters were similar between the NTG and POAG groups (all P>0.05). Average RNFL thickness did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.053), whereas average GCC thickness significantly differed between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.001). In terms of pattern-based parameters of GCC, focal loss volume did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.165), whereas global loss volume was significantly higher in the POAG group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RNFL and GCC measurements with respect to the ability to detect glaucomatous changes.
GCC loss in the NTG group was more localized compared with diffuse GCC loss in the POAG group. Perimacular GCC parameters could be a good alternative or supplement to peripapillary RNFL measurements for diagnosis and research in patients with NTG.
比较正常眼压青光眼(NTG)和原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的黄斑区神经节细胞复合体(GCC)参数。
2009 年 1 月至 6 月连续纳入参与者,进行光学相干断层扫描成像,使用 RTVue-100(Optovue Inc,加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特)。获取视神经头(ONH)参数、视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)参数和 GCC 参数。使用方差分析比较正常、NTG 和 POAG 组中 ONH、RNFL 和 GCC 参数的平均测量值。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积评估每个参数检测青光眼变化的能力。
纳入 58 名正常对照者、51 名 NTG 患者和 52 名 POAG 患者。ONH 参数的平均测量值在 NTG 和 POAG 组之间相似(均 P>0.05)。NTG 和 POAG 组之间的平均 RNFL 厚度无差异(P=0.053),而 NTG 和 POAG 组之间的平均 GCC 厚度差异显著(P=0.001)。就 GCC 的基于模式的参数而言,NTG 和 POAG 组之间的焦点丢失体积无差异(P=0.165),而 POAG 组的全局丢失体积显著更高(P<0.001)。在检测青光眼变化的能力方面,RNFL 和 GCC 测量值之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
与 POAG 组弥漫性 GCC 丢失相比,NTG 组的 GCC 丢失更局限。黄斑区 GCC 参数可能是 NTG 患者诊断和研究的一种替代或补充方法,可替代或补充周边 RNFL 测量。