• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较含防腐剂和不含防腐剂的双氯芬酸钠滴眼液的眼部耐受性。

Comparison of ocular tolerability between preserved and preservative-free diclofenac sodium drops.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;27(4):333-7. doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0001. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1089/jop.2011.0001
PMID:21702687
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the tolerability of preserved diclofenac sodium 0.1% (Voltaren Ophtha) and preservative-free diclofenac (Dicloftil).

METHODS

Thirty healthy volunteers received a single drop of Voltaren Ophtha in 1 eye, and a single drop of Dicloftil in the other. Both drops were instilled at the same time, in a single-blind manner. Visual analog scale grading was used to measure ocular discomfort, itch, burn, and pain. Grading was obtained before drop instillation and after 15 s, 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min.

RESULTS

Both preparations caused discomfort, itch, burn, and pain, with a peak effect on all 4 parameters at 15 min. However, preservative-free Dicloftil proved to be more tolerable than preserved Voltaren Ophtha. Data show significantly lower reported levels of discomfort and itch up to 15 min, lower levels of burn at the first minute, and less pain immediately after instillation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to compare subjective ocular tolerability of a single drop. Our results indicate that Dicloftil has better tolerability than Voltaren Ophtha. Ophthalmologists should be aware of this significant difference when prescribing diclofenac, especially in patients with low compliance or who require prolonged therapy.

摘要

目的

比较含防腐剂的 0.1%双氯芬酸钠(Voltaren Ophtha)和不含防腐剂的双氯芬酸(Dicloftil)的耐受性。

方法

30 名健康志愿者同时接受单滴 Voltaren Ophtha 滴入 1 只眼,以及单滴 Dicloftil 滴入另 1 只眼。采用单盲法进行。使用视觉模拟量表评分来衡量眼部不适、瘙痒、烧灼感和疼痛。在滴注前和滴注后 15s、1min、5min、15min 和 30min 进行评分。

结果

两种制剂均引起不适、瘙痒、烧灼感和疼痛,所有 4 个参数在 15min 时达到高峰效应。然而,不含防腐剂的 Dicloftil 比含防腐剂的 Voltaren Ophtha 更耐受。数据显示,在 15min 内报告的不适和瘙痒程度显著降低,在第 1 分钟时烧灼感程度较低,滴注后即刻疼痛程度较轻。

结论

这是第一项比较单滴眼部耐受性的研究。我们的结果表明,Dicloftil 比 Voltaren Ophtha 具有更好的耐受性。眼科医生在开处方时应注意到这种显著差异,特别是在低依从性或需要长期治疗的患者中。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ocular tolerability between preserved and preservative-free diclofenac sodium drops.比较含防腐剂和不含防腐剂的双氯芬酸钠滴眼液的眼部耐受性。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;27(4):333-7. doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0001. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free and preserved diclofenac and preserved ketorolac eyedrops after cataract surgery.白内障手术后无防腐剂和含防腐剂的双氯芬酸及酮咯酸滴眼液的疗效和耐受性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;149(5):777-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
3
Evaluation of diclofenac sodium 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of ocular symptoms after bilateral radial keratotomy.0.1%双氯芬酸钠滴眼液治疗双侧放射状角膜切开术后眼部症状的疗效评估。
Cornea. 1997 Jul;16(4):406-13.
4
Comparison of the Tolerability of Diclofenac and Nepafenac.双氯芬酸与奈帕芬胺耐受性的比较。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Nov;32(9):601-605. doi: 10.1089/jop.2016.0057. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
5
[Ocular tolerance of a new formulation of nonpreserved diclofenac].[新型无防腐剂双氯芬酸制剂的眼耐受性]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004 Sep;27(7):739-44. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(04)96208-0.
6
A comparison of two different formulations of diclofenac sodium 0.1% in the treatment of inflammation following cataract-intraocular lens surgery.两种不同剂型的0.1%双氯芬酸钠治疗白内障人工晶状体植入术后炎症的比较。
Drugs R D. 2002;3(3):143-51. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200203030-00001.
7
[Tetracaine versus diclofenac in the treatment of pain following refractive photokeratectomy].[丁卡因与双氯芬酸治疗屈光性光角膜切除术后疼痛的比较]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1999 Feb;22(1):14-20.
8
Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsules in the management of patients with postbunionectomy pain: a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over 5 days.双氯芬酸钾充液软胶囊治疗跗骨后切除术后疼痛的 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究:为期 5 天。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2072-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.011.
9
Analgesic efficacy and safety of the diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% (DETP) in minor soft tissue injury.双氯芬酸乙氨丁三醇贴剂(DETP)1.3%治疗轻度软组织损伤的镇痛疗效和安全性。
Int J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;32(8):635-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275359. Epub 2011 May 11.
10
Review of the efficacy and tolerability of the diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% in patients with acute pain due to soft tissue injuries.双氯芬酸乙氨丁三醇贴剂 1.3%治疗软组织损伤急性疼痛的疗效和耐受性评价。
Clin Ther. 2010 Jun;32(6):1001-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.001.

引用本文的文献

1
The prevalence and characteristics of chronic ocular itch: a cross-sectional survey.慢性眼部瘙痒的患病率及特征:一项横断面调查
Itch (Phila). 2017 Mar;2(1):e4. doi: 10.1097/itx.0000000000000004. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
2
Pupil dilation using drops vs gel: a comparative study.使用滴眼液与凝胶进行瞳孔扩张:一项对比研究。
Eye (Lond). 2015 Jun;29(6):815-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.47. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
3
Evaluation of pain during intravitreal Ozurdex injections vs. intravitreal bevacizumab injections.玻璃体内注射Ozurdex与玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗时疼痛情况的评估。
Eye (Lond). 2014 Aug;28(8):980-5. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.129. Epub 2014 Jun 13.