Computer and Computational Sciences Division, Los Alamos National LaboratoryDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
Cogn Sci. 2005 Nov 12;29(6):1061-76. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_30.
Similarity underlies fundamental cognitive capabilities such as memory, categorization, decision making, problem solving, and reasoning. Although recent approaches to similarity appreciate the structure of mental representations, they differ in the processes posited to operate over these representations. We present an experiment that differentiates among extant structural accounts of similarity in their ability to account for patterns of similarity ratings. These data pose a challenge for transformation-based models and all but one mapping-based model, the Similarity as Interactive Activation and Mapping (SIAM) model of similarity.
相似性是记忆、分类、决策、解决问题和推理等基本认知能力的基础。尽管最近的相似性研究方法认识到心理表征的结构,但它们在假定作用于这些表征的过程上有所不同。我们进行了一项实验,以区分相似性的现有结构解释在解释相似性评分模式方面的能力。这些数据对基于转换的模型和除相似性作为交互式激活和映射(SIAM)模型之外的所有基于映射的模型提出了挑战。