• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者参与研究:澳大利亚癌症试验网站。

Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website.

机构信息

Sydney Medical School, Room 391, Blackburn Building, D06, The University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 26;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-30.

DOI:10.1186/1478-4505-9-30
PMID:21703017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3141790/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Australian Cancer Trials website (ACTO) was publicly launched in 2010 to help people search for cancer clinical trials recruiting in Australia, provide information about clinical trials and assist with doctor-patient communication about trials. We describe consumer involvement in the design and development of ACTO and report our preliminary patient evaluation of the website.

METHODS

Consumers, led by Cancer Voices NSW, provided the impetus to develop the website. Consumer representative groups were consulted by the research team during the design and development of ACTO which combines a search engine, trial details, general information about trial participation and question prompt lists. Website use was analysed. A patient evaluation questionnaire was completed at one hospital, one week after exposure to the website.

RESULTS

ACTO's main features and content reflect consumer input. In February 2011, it covered 1, 042 cancer trials. Since ACTO's public launch in November 2010, until the end of February 2011, the website has had 2, 549 new visits and generated 17, 833 page views. In a sub-study of 47 patient users, 89% found the website helpful for learning about clinical trials and all respondents thought patients should have access to ACTO.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of ACTO is an example of consumers working with doctors, researchers and policy makers to improve the information available to people whose lives are affected by cancer and to help them participate in their treatment decisions, including consideration of clinical trial enrolment. Consumer input has ensured that the website is informative, targets consumer priorities and is user-friendly. ACTO serves as a model for other health conditions.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚癌症试验网站(ACTO)于 2010 年公开推出,旨在帮助人们搜索在澳大利亚招募的癌症临床试验,提供有关临床试验的信息,并协助医患沟通有关试验的问题。我们描述了消费者在 ACTO 的设计和开发中的参与情况,并报告了我们对该网站的初步患者评估。

方法

消费者在新南威尔士州癌症之声的带领下为开发该网站提供了动力。研究团队在设计和开发 ACTO 期间咨询了消费者代表团体,该网站结合了搜索引擎、试验详细信息、有关试验参与的一般信息和问题提示列表。分析了网站的使用情况。在暴露于该网站一周后,在一家医院完成了患者评估问卷。

结果

ACTO 的主要功能和内容反映了消费者的投入。2011 年 2 月,它涵盖了 1042 项癌症试验。自 2010 年 11 月 ACTO 公开推出以来,截至 2011 年 2 月底,该网站已收到 2549 次新访问,产生了 17833 次页面浏览量。在对 47 名患者用户的子研究中,89%的患者认为该网站有助于了解临床试验,所有受访者都认为患者应该能够访问 ACTO。

结论

ACTO 的开发是消费者与医生、研究人员和政策制定者合作的一个例子,旨在改善对癌症患者及其生活产生影响的人的信息获取,并帮助他们参与他们的治疗决策,包括考虑临床试验的参与。消费者的投入确保了网站信息丰富、针对消费者的重点并易于使用。ACTO 为其他健康状况提供了模型。

相似文献

1
Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website.消费者参与研究:澳大利亚癌症试验网站。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 26;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-30.
2
Adding value to clinical trial registries: insights from Australian Cancer Trials Online, a website for consumers.为临床试验注册增添价值:来自澳大利亚癌症临床试验在线网站(一个面向消费者的网站)的见解。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):70-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774510392392.
3
Evaluation of Web-Based Consumer Medication Information: Content and Usability of 4 Australian Websites.基于网络的消费者用药信息评估:4个澳大利亚网站的内容与可用性
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Jul 21;5(3):e21. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.5651.
4
A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的概况:一项针对临床试验网络和研究机构的全国性调查结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w.
5
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.流量来源以及访客对在线质量公开报告的偏好:网络分析与在线调查结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.
6
Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.消费者参与制定医疗保健政策与研究、临床实践指南及患者信息材料的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
User information seeking behaviour: perceptions and reality. An evaluation of the WHO Labresources Internet portal.用户信息寻求行为:认知与现实。对世界卫生组织实验室资源互联网门户网站的评估。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2009 Jan;34(1):30-8. doi: 10.1080/17538150902779204.
9
Web usage data as a means of evaluating public health messaging and outreach.网络使用数据作为评估公共卫生信息传播和宣传推广的一种手段。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Dec 21;11(4):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1278.
10
The Brustkrebs-Studien.de website for breast cancer patients: User acceptance of a German internet portal offering information on the disease and treatment options, and a clinical trials matching service.Brustkrebs-Studien.de 网站是为乳腺癌患者提供服务的:对提供疾病和治疗选择信息以及临床试验匹配服务的德国互联网门户的用户接受度调查。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Dec 2;10:663. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-663.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence clinical trial participation for oncology patients in Australia: a scoping review.影响澳大利亚肿瘤患者参与临床试验的因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):e095355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095355.
2
Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.当前患者和公众参与癌症研究的趋势:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):3-20. doi: 10.1111/hex.12841. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
Characteristics of clinical trial websites: information distribution between ClinicalTrials.gov and 13 primary registries in the WHO registry network.

本文引用的文献

1
The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues.ClinicalTrials.gov 结果数据库——更新及主要问题。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):852-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012065.
2
Internet to boost patient accrual in oncology trials? A multiinstitutional AERIO study.
Ann Oncol. 2011 Feb;22(2):490-1. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq746. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
3
The Brustkrebs-Studien.de website for breast cancer patients: User acceptance of a German internet portal offering information on the disease and treatment options, and a clinical trials matching service.Brustkrebs-Studien.de 网站是为乳腺癌患者提供服务的:对提供疾病和治疗选择信息以及临床试验匹配服务的德国互联网门户的用户接受度调查。
临床试验网站的特征:世界卫生组织注册网络中ClinicalTrials.gov与13个主要注册机构之间的信息传播
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:428. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-428.
4
Thank you for your lovely card: ethical considerations in responding to bereaved parents invited in error to participate in childhood cancer survivorship research.感谢您送来的暖心贺卡:回应被错误邀请参与儿童癌症幸存者研究的丧亲父母时的伦理考量。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Feb;18(1):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9587-4.
5
Patient recruitment into a multicenter randomized clinical trial for kidney disease: report of the focal segmental glomerulosclerosis clinical trial (FSGS CT).招募肾脏病多中心随机临床试验患者:局灶节段性肾小球硬化症临床试验报告(FSGS CT)。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/cts.12003. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
BMC Cancer. 2010 Dec 2;10:663. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-663.
4
Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: development of a question prompt list.提高癌症临床试验参与决策:问题提示清单的制定。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1227-38. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0942-6. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
5
A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer.癌症患者的互联网使用情况调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1183-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0935-5. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
6
Patient internet use surrounding cancer clinical trials: clinician perceptions and responses.患者在癌症临床试验方面的网络使用情况:临床医生的看法和应对措施。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 May;31(3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
7
Can web 2.0 reboot clinical trials?Web 2.0 能否重启临床试验?
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Oct;27(10):895-902. doi: 10.1038/nbt1009-895.
8
From inclusion to independence--training consumers to review research.从参与到独立——培训消费者评估研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Mar 9;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-3.
9
Operationalising a model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research.实施一个消费者和社区参与健康与医学研究的模型框架。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 26;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-13.
10
Beyond scientific rigour: funding cancer research of public value.超越科学严谨性:资助具有公共价值的癌症研究。
Health Policy. 2007 Dec;84(2-3):234-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jun 15.