Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的概况:一项针对临床试验网络和研究机构的全国性调查结果

A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.

作者信息

McKenzie Anne, Bowden Janelle, Zalcberg John R, Conroy Karena, Fallon-Ferguson Julia, Jesudason Shilpanjali, Ansell James, Anderst Ania, Straiton Nicola

机构信息

Consumer Engagement, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.

AccessCR Pty Ltd, Gordon, NSW, 2072, Australia.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the extent, perceptions or experiences of consumers involved in clinical trials across Australia. The purpose of this National study was to better understand the activity and perceptions of clinical trial networks (CTNs), research co-ordinating centres and their consumers, around consumer involvement in clinical trials.

METHODS

CTNs and research co-ordinating centres who were members of the Australian Clinical Trials Alliance (ACTA), and consumers involved in the activities of these organisations, were invited to participate in online surveys. Surveys were completed between April and September 2018.

RESULTS

80 respondents completed the surveys in full: 25 of 34 CTNs, 5 from 15 research co-ordinating centres, and included research investigators of 13 active trials, 10 completed trials. There were 27 consumer respondents. Consumers were involved in clinical trial activities across 19/25 (76%) of CTNs and 3/5 (60%) of research co-ordinating centres. Consumers were involved at all stages of the trial cycle. Despite this, only 8/30 (27%) of research organisations provided specific training to their employees or members on consumer involvement in research, and most did not have a specific policy or process relating to conducting consumer involvement in clinical trials. At the organisation level, barriers to consumer involvement in clinical trials included being unsure how to involve consumers effectively and systematically, difficulty in accessing consumers or lack of infrastructure and resources. At the consumer level, barriers included limited understanding of their roles, a lack of resources and training. Enablers included education, training and funding for both the research sector and for consumers. Almost all consumer respondents (25/27; 92%) would recommend the consumer role to other potential consumers, stating it was a valuable experience that led to knowledge exchange and learning about the research process.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last few years, consumer involvement in clinical trials has increased in Australia, but the scope of involvement varies across different research organisations, and therapeutic areas. Consumer involvement in clinical trials is valued by most that do it, however, there are opportunities to further foster and strengthen ongoing partnerships, for example by providing practical advice for researchers on how to best engage and involve consumers.

摘要

背景

对于澳大利亚参与临床试验的消费者的参与程度、看法或经历,人们了解甚少。这项全国性研究的目的是更好地了解临床试验网络(CTN)、研究协调中心及其消费者在消费者参与临床试验方面的活动和看法。

方法

邀请澳大利亚临床试验联盟(ACTA)成员中的CTN和研究协调中心,以及参与这些组织活动的消费者参与在线调查。调查于2018年4月至9月期间完成。

结果

80名受访者完整填写了调查问卷:34个CTN中的25个,15个研究协调中心中的5个,其中包括13项正在进行的试验的研究调查人员,10项已完成试验的调查人员。有27名消费者受访者。消费者参与了25个CTN中的19个(76%)以及5个研究协调中心中的3个(60%)的临床试验活动。消费者参与了试验周期的各个阶段。尽管如此,30个研究组织中只有8个(27%)为其员工或成员提供了关于消费者参与研究的具体培训,而且大多数组织没有关于开展消费者参与临床试验的具体政策或流程。在组织层面,消费者参与临床试验的障碍包括不确定如何有效和系统地让消费者参与、难以接触到消费者或缺乏基础设施和资源。在消费者层面,障碍包括对自身角色的理解有限、缺乏资源和培训。促进因素包括为研究部门和消费者提供教育、培训和资金。几乎所有消费者受访者(25/27;92%)都会向其他潜在消费者推荐消费者角色,称这是一次宝贵的经历,带来了知识交流和对研究过程的了解。

结论

在过去几年中,澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的情况有所增加,但不同研究组织和治疗领域的参与范围各不相同。大多数参与临床试验的消费者认为其很有价值,然而,仍有机会进一步促进和加强现有的伙伴关系,例如为研究人员提供关于如何最好地吸引和让消费者参与的实用建议。

相似文献

4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.
8
How do consumer leaders co-create value in mental health organisations?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Oct;41(5):505-510. doi: 10.1071/AH16105.
9
Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Nov 18;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-34.

引用本文的文献

5
Public involvement in Australian clinical trials: A systematic review.
Clin Trials. 2024 Aug;21(4):507-515. doi: 10.1177/17407745231224533. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Exploring Consumers' Motivations and Experiences of Engaging as Partners in Cancer Research.
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):471-479. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00667-2. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
7
Patient and public involvement in pragmatic trials: online survey of corresponding authors of published trials.
CMAJ Open. 2023 Sep 19;11(5):E826-E837. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220198. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
8
[Participation of Patients in the Development of Clinical Guidelines: A Selective Country Comparison in a Narrative Review].
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Nov;85(11):967-974. doi: 10.1055/a-2057-0422. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Researcher Perceptions of Involving Consumers in Health Research in Australia: A Qualitative Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 9;20(10):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105758.
10
'Learning and growing together': exploring consumer partnerships in a PhD, an ethnographic study.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 15;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00417-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Nothing about us without us: involving patient collaborators for machine learning applications in rheumatology.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Dec;80(12):1505-1510. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220454. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
2
Formalising the induction of patient and public involvement contributors on trial oversight committees.
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 17;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00269-y.
3
The value proposition of investigator-initiated clinical trials conducted by networks.
Med J Aust. 2021 Mar;214(4):159-161.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50935. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
4
Engaging consumers in health research: a narrative review.
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Sep;44(5):806-813. doi: 10.1071/AH19202.
5
Transgender HIV research: nothing about us without us.
Lancet HIV. 2019 Sep;6(9):e566-e567. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30269-3. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.
Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):3-20. doi: 10.1111/hex.12841. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
Inverting the patient involvement paradigm: defining patient led research.
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jul 10;4:21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0104-4. eCollection 2018.
10
Involving consumers in health research: what do consumers say?
Public Health Res Pract. 2018 Jun 14;28(2):2821813. doi: 10.17061/phrp2821813.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验