• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的消费者用药信息评估:4个澳大利亚网站的内容与可用性

Evaluation of Web-Based Consumer Medication Information: Content and Usability of 4 Australian Websites.

作者信息

Raban Magdalena Z, Tariq Amina, Richardson Lauren, Byrne Mary, Robinson Maureen, Li Ling, Westbrook Johanna I, Baysari Melissa T

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2016 Jul 21;5(3):e21. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.5651.

DOI:10.2196/ijmr.5651
PMID:27443680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4974450/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication is the most common intervention in health care, and written medication information can affect consumers' medication-related behavior. Research has shown that a large proportion of Australians search for medication information on the Internet.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the medication information content, based on consumer medication information needs, and usability of 4 Australian health websites: Better Health Channel, myDr, healthdirect, and NPS MedicineWise .

METHODS

To assess website content, the most common consumer medication information needs were identified using (1) medication queries to the healthdirect helpline (a telephone helpline available across most of Australia) and (2) the most frequently used medications in Australia. The most frequently used medications were extracted from Australian government statistics on use of subsidized medicines in the community and the National Census of Medicines Use. Each website was assessed to determine whether it covered or partially covered information and advice about these medications. To assess website usability, 16 consumers participated in user testing wherein they were required to locate 2 pieces of medication information on each website. Brief semistructured interviews were also conducted with participants to gauge their opinions of the websites.

RESULTS

Information on prescription medication was more comprehensively covered on all websites (3 of 4 websites covered 100% of information) than nonprescription medication (websites covered 0%-67% of information). Most websites relied on consumer medicines information leaflets to convey prescription medication information to consumers. Information about prescription medication classes was less comprehensive, with no website providing all information examined about antibiotics and antidepressants. Participants (n=16) were able to locate medication information on websites in most cases (accuracy ranged from 84% to 91%). However, a number of usability issues relating to website navigation and information display were identified. For example, websites not allowing combinations of search terms to be entered in search boxes and continuous blocks of text without subheadings.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the 4 Australian health information websites tested, none provided consumers with comprehensive medication information on both prescription and nonprescription medications in a user-friendly way. Using data on consumer information needs and user testing to guide medication information content and website design is a useful approach to inform consumer website development.

摘要

背景

药物治疗是医疗保健中最常见的干预措施,书面药物信息会影响消费者与药物相关的行为。研究表明,很大一部分澳大利亚人在互联网上搜索药物信息。

目的

根据消费者的药物信息需求,评估4个澳大利亚健康网站(“健康频道”、“我的医生”、“健康直通车”和“澳大利亚药品与保健品管理局明智用药”)的药物信息内容及可用性。

方法

为评估网站内容,利用以下两种方式确定最常见的消费者药物信息需求:(1)向“健康直通车”热线(澳大利亚大部分地区都可拨打的电话热线)咨询药物问题;(2)澳大利亚最常用的药物。最常用的药物是从澳大利亚政府关于社区补贴药物使用情况的统计数据以及全国药物使用普查中提取的。对每个网站进行评估,以确定其是否涵盖或部分涵盖了有关这些药物的信息和建议。为评估网站的可用性,16名消费者参与了用户测试,他们被要求在每个网站上查找两条药物信息。还与参与者进行了简短的半结构化访谈,以了解他们对这些网站的看法。

结果

与非处方药相比,所有网站上关于处方药的信息覆盖得更全面(4个网站中有3个网站涵盖了100%的信息),而非处方药的信息覆盖范围为0%-67%。大多数网站依靠消费者药品信息传单向消费者传达处方药信息。关于处方药类别的信息不够全面,没有一个网站提供了所考察的关于抗生素和抗抑郁药的所有信息。在大多数情况下,16名参与者能够在网站上找到药物信息(准确率在84%至91%之间)。然而,发现了一些与网站导航和信息显示有关的可用性问题。例如,网站不允许在搜索框中输入搜索词组合,且文本连续成块,没有副标题。

结论

在测试的4个澳大利亚健康信息网站中,没有一个以用户友好的方式为消费者提供关于处方药和非处方药的全面药物信息。利用消费者信息需求数据和用户测试来指导药物信息内容和网站设计,是为消费者网站开发提供信息的一种有用方法。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Web-Based Consumer Medication Information: Content and Usability of 4 Australian Websites.基于网络的消费者用药信息评估:4个澳大利亚网站的内容与可用性
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Jul 21;5(3):e21. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.5651.
2
Can online consumers contribute to drug knowledge? A mixed-methods comparison of consumer-generated and professionally controlled psychotropic medication information on the internet.在线消费者能为药物知识做出贡献吗?互联网上消费者生成的与专业控制的精神药物信息的混合方法比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jul 29;13(3):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1716.
3
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.流量来源以及访客对在线质量公开报告的偏好:网络分析与在线调查结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.
4
A Newly Developed Web-Based Resource on Genetic Eye Disorders for Users With Visual Impairment (Gene.Vision): Usability Study.面向视力障碍用户的新型遗传性眼病网络资源 (Gene.Vision):可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e19151. doi: 10.2196/19151.
5
Comparative User Testing of Australian and UK Over-the-Counter Labels and Leaflets for Diclofenac.双氯芬酸澳大利亚和英国非处方标签及说明书的用户对比测试
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Jan;52(1):38-48. doi: 10.1177/2168479017711730. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
6
Defining Information Quality Into Health Websites: A Conceptual Framework of Health Website Information Quality for Educated Young Adults.界定健康网站的信息质量:针对受过教育的年轻人的健康网站信息质量概念框架
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Oct 6;4(4):e25. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6455.
7
Usability of Health Information Websites Designed for Adolescents: Systematic Review, Neurodevelopmental Model, and Design Brief.为青少年设计的健康信息网站的可用性:系统评价、神经发育模型与设计简报。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 23;21(4):e11584. doi: 10.2196/11584.
8
How Internet Contracts Impact Research: Content Analysis of Terms of Service on Consumer Product Websites.互联网合同如何影响研究:消费者产品网站服务条款的内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 2;6(4):e23579. doi: 10.2196/23579.
9
Development of consumer information leaflets for deprescribing in older hospital inpatients: a mixed-methods study.为老年住院患者减药开发患者信息传单:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033303.
10
Adding value to clinical trial registries: insights from Australian Cancer Trials Online, a website for consumers.为临床试验注册增添价值:来自澳大利亚癌症临床试验在线网站(一个面向消费者的网站)的见解。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):70-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774510392392.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness and limitations of online health information tools in assessing the quality of medication-related content.评估在线健康信息工具在评估药物相关内容质量方面的有效性和局限性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 24;13:1460202. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1460202. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacists' Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Electronic Product Information System Implementation in Hong Kong: Mixed-Method Study.药剂师对香港电子产品信息系统实施的益处和挑战的看法:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 10;22(11):e20765. doi: 10.2196/20765.
3
Analysis of user behavior on the website of a university eye hospital in Germany.德国一家大学眼科医院网站上的用户行为分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21348. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021348.
4
Evaluating Online Consumer Medication Information Systems: Comparative Online Usability Study.评估在线消费者药物信息系统:比较在线易用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 3;8(6):e16648. doi: 10.2196/16648.
5
Constructing a bilingual website with validated database for Herb and Western medicine interactions using Ginseng, Ginkgo and Dong Quai as examples.构建一个具有验证数据库的中、英双语网站,以人参、银杏和当归为例,展示草药和西药之间的相互作用。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2731-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.低健康素养与在线健康信息评估:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4018.
2
Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.健康素养与互联网:一项关于澳大利亚在线健康信息可读性的研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Aug;39(4):309-14. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12341. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
3
Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions.谷歌医生与消费者:一项定性研究,探索慢性病患者的导航需求及在线健康信息寻求行为
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 2;16(12):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3706.
4
The value of usability testing for Internet-based adolescent self-management interventions: "Managing Hemophilia Online".基于互联网的青少年自我管理干预措施的可用性测试的价值:“Managing Hemophilia Online”。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Oct 4;13:113. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-113.
5
Quality of health and medication information on Brazilian websites.巴西网站上健康与药物信息的质量。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul-Sep;10(3):335-41. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082012000300014.
6
Assessment of the quality of medication information for patients in Spain.评估西班牙患者用药信息的质量。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;12(1):9-18. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.744965. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
7
Assessing the quality, suitability and readability of internet-based health information about warfarin for patients.评估面向患者的关于华法林的网络健康信息的质量、适用性和可读性。
Australas Med J. 2012;5(3):194-203. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2012862. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
8
Beyond needs and expectations: identifying the barriers and facilitators to written medicine information provision and use in Australia.超越需求和期望:确定澳大利亚提供和使用书面医学信息的障碍和促进因素。
Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):220-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00753.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
A nationwide evaluation on electronic medication-related information provided by hospital websites.全国范围内对医院网站提供的电子用药相关信息的评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01823.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
10
A national census of medicines use: a 24-hour snapshot of Australians aged 50 years and older.全国药物使用普查:对 50 岁及以上澳大利亚人的 24 小时快照。
Med J Aust. 2012 Jan 16;196(1):50-3. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10698.