Mt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester, 187 Edinburgh Street, Rochester, NY 14608, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;50(7):659-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
To examine illogical thinking in children from low-income families with and without histories of child maltreatment.
Maltreated (n = 91) and nonmaltreated (n = 43) school-age children individually participated in a story game designed to elicit speech samples. Children were instructed to listen to two recorded stories and prompted to retell the story; they then were asked to create their own story from possible topics. Child behavior ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist were completed by research assistants following 35 hours of observation.
Maltreated children exhibited more illogical thinking than did nonmaltreated children, and the level of illogical thinking in maltreated children was in the clinically pathological range. The occurrence of multiple subtypes of maltreatment and the chronicity of the maltreatment also were associated with illogical thinking. Dissociation did not differ between groups, although it was related to illogical thinking.
The ability to formulate ideas and communicate them logically is compromised in children who have been maltreated. These results extend prior research on selective attentional processes and negativity biases in maltreated children.
探讨有和没有虐待儿童史的低收入家庭儿童的不合理思维。
受虐待(n=91)和未受虐待(n=43)的学龄儿童分别参与了一个旨在引出言语样本的故事游戏。要求儿童听两段录制的故事,并提示他们复述故事;然后,他们被要求从可能的主题中创作自己的故事。研究助理在 35 小时的观察后,根据儿童行为检查表上的儿童行为评分。
受虐待的儿童比未受虐待的儿童表现出更多的不合理思维,受虐待的儿童的不合理思维水平处于临床病理范围。多种虐待类型的发生和虐待的慢性化也与不合理思维有关。两组之间的分离程度没有差异,尽管它与不合理思维有关。
遭受虐待的儿童在构思和逻辑表达方面的能力受损。这些结果扩展了先前关于受虐待儿童选择性注意过程和消极偏见的研究。