Narayan Angela J, Allen Timothy A, Cullen Kathryn R, Klimes-Dougan Bonnie
Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bipolar Disord. 2013 Nov;15(7):723-40. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12115. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
This comprehensive review examined the prevalence and progression of disturbances in reality testing (DRT), defined as psychotic symptoms, cognitive disruptions, and thought problems, in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (O-BD). Our approach was grounded in a developmental psychopathology perspective and considered a broader phenotype of risk within the bipolar-schizophrenia spectrum as measured by categorical and dimensional assessments of DRT in high-risk youth.
Relevant studies were identified from numerous sources (e.g., PubMed, reference sections, and colleagues). Inclusion criteria were: (i) family risk studies published between 1975 and 2012 in which O-BD were contrasted with a comparison group (e.g., offspring of parents who had other psychiatric disorders or were healthy) on DRT outcomes and (ii) results reported for categorical or dimensional assessments of DRT (e.g., schizophrenia, psychotic symptoms, cluster A personality traits, or thought problems), yielding a total of 23 studies.
Three key findings emerged: (i) categorical approaches of DRT in O-BD produced low incidence base rates and almost no evidence of significant differences in DRT between O-BD and comparison groups, whereas (ii) many studies using dimensional assessments of DRT yielded significant group differences in DRT. Furthermore, (iii) preliminary evidence from dimensional measures suggested that the developmental progression of DRT in O-BD might represent a prodrome of severe psychological impairment.
Preliminary but promising evidence suggests that DRT is a probable marker of risk for future impairment in O-BD. Methodological strengths and weaknesses, the psychometric properties of primary DRT constructs, and future directions for developmental and longitudinal research with O-BD are discussed.
本综述全面考察了双相情感障碍患者的子女(O-BD)中现实检验障碍(DRT,定义为精神病性症状、认知紊乱和思维问题)的患病率及进展情况。我们的研究方法基于发展心理病理学视角,并将双相情感障碍-精神分裂症谱系内更广泛的风险表型视为高风险青少年中通过DRT的分类和维度评估所测量的内容。
从众多来源(如PubMed、参考文献及同事提供的信息)中识别出相关研究。纳入标准为:(i)1975年至2012年间发表的家族风险研究,其中在DRT结果方面将O-BD与对照组(如患有其他精神疾病或健康父母的子女)进行对比;(ii)报告了DRT分类或维度评估结果(如精神分裂症、精神病性症状、A类人格特质或思维问题),共得出23项研究。
出现了三个关键发现:(i)O-BD中DRT的分类方法得出的发病率基础率较低,且几乎没有证据表明O-BD与对照组在DRT方面存在显著差异,而(ii)许多使用DRT维度评估的研究在DRT方面得出了显著的组间差异。此外,(iii)维度测量的初步证据表明,O-BD中DRT的发展进程可能代表严重心理损害的前驱症状。
初步但有前景的证据表明,DRT可能是O-BD未来出现损害风险的一个标志物。讨论了方法学的优缺点、主要DRT结构的心理测量特性以及O-BD发展和纵向研究的未来方向。