• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换术后麻醉下手法治疗:长期随访

Manipulation under anaesthesia post total knee replacement: long term follow up.

作者信息

Yeoh David, Nicolaou Nick, Goddard Richard, Willmott Henry, Miles Kim, East Debra, Hinves Barry, Shepperd John, Butler-Manuel Adrian

机构信息

Conquest Hospital, East Sussex Hospital Trust Hastings, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Knee. 2012 Aug;19(4):329-31. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2011.05.009
PMID:21703859
Abstract

A reduced range of motion post total knee replacement (TKR) is a recognised problem. Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) is commonly performed in the stiff post-operative TKR. Long-term results are variable in the literature. We retrospectively reviewed, prospectively collected data on 48 patients followed up since 1996 from one centre, over an average of 7.5 years, (range 1 to 10 years) and report on the long-term results. During the study period 2.3% of TKRs underwent MUA. The mean time to MUA post TKR was 12.3 weeks (range 3 to 48). Pre MUA, the mean flexion was 53°. The mean immediate passive flexion post MUA was 97°, an improvement of 44° (Range 10° to 90°, p<0.05). By 1year, the mean flexion was 87°, an improvement of 34°, (range -15° to 70°, p<0.05). At 10 years the mean flexion was 86°, (range 55° to 100°, p<0.05). We found no difference in the gain in range of motion (ROM) between knees manipulated before or after 12 weeks. Additionally, the gain was no different in stiff knees with a pre TKR ROM <90°, compared to a pre TKR ROM >90°. There were no complications as a result of MUA. However, one patient was eventually revised at 2 years secondary to low grade infection. Our findings show that MUA is a safe and effective method at improving the ROM in a stiff post-operative TKR. The improvement is maintained in the long term irrespective of time to MUA and range of motion pre TKR.

摘要

全膝关节置换术(TKR)后活动范围减小是一个公认的问题。麻醉下手法松解(MUA)常用于TKR术后僵硬的情况。文献中关于其长期效果的报道各不相同。我们对自1996年起来自一个中心的48例患者进行了回顾性研究,并前瞻性收集了数据,平均随访7.5年(范围1至10年),并报告长期结果。在研究期间,2.3%的TKR患者接受了MUA。TKR后进行MUA的平均时间为12.3周(范围3至48周)。MUA前,平均屈曲角度为53°。MUA后即时被动屈曲平均角度为97°,改善了44°(范围10°至90°,p<0.05)。到1年时,平均屈曲角度为87°,改善了34°(范围-15°至70°,p<0.05)。在10年时,平均屈曲角度为86°(范围55°至100°,p<0.05)。我们发现,在12周之前或之后进行手法松解的膝关节,其活动范围(ROM)的增加没有差异。此外,与TKR术前ROM>90°的僵硬膝关节相比,TKR术前ROM<90°的僵硬膝关节在ROM增加方面没有差异。MUA没有导致并发症。然而,有1例患者在2年后因低度感染最终进行了翻修。我们的研究结果表明,MUA是改善TKR术后僵硬膝关节ROM的一种安全有效的方法。无论进行MUA的时间和TKR术前的活动范围如何,这种改善在长期内都能维持。

相似文献

1
Manipulation under anaesthesia post total knee replacement: long term follow up.全膝关节置换术后麻醉下手法治疗:长期随访
Knee. 2012 Aug;19(4):329-31. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
2
[Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty].[术前活动范围对全膝关节置换术早期临床疗效的影响]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Aug 15;44(16):1101-5.
3
Knee manipulation under anaesthetic following total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort design.全膝关节置换术后在麻醉下进行膝关节手法操作:一项配对队列设计。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1640-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.35767.
4
Manipulation under anesthesia for post traumatic stiff knee-pearls, pitfalls and risk factors for failure.创伤后膝关节僵硬的麻醉下手法治疗——要点、陷阱及失败的危险因素
Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2315-2319. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
5
Arthrofibrosis following total knee replacement; does therapeutic warfarin make a difference?全膝关节置换术后的关节纤维化;治疗性华法林有作用吗?
Knee. 2005 Apr;12(2):103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.004.
6
Stiffness after knee arthrotomy: evaluation of prevalence and results after manipulation under anaesthesia.膝关节切开术后僵硬:麻醉下手法复位后发生率和结果的评估。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 May;97(3):292-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
7
Predictors of outcome after manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with a stiff total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换僵硬患者麻醉下手法治疗后预后的预测因素
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3637-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4413-6. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
8
The long-term outcome of total knee patients with moderate loss of motion.膝关节活动度中度丧失的全膝关节置换患者的长期预后。
J Knee Surg. 2003 Oct;16(4):215-20.
9
Is discharge knee range of motion a useful and relevant clinical indicator after total knee replacement? Part 2.膝关节置换术后膝关节活动度的出院标准是否是一种有用且相关的临床指标?第 2 部分。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):652-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01656.x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
10
[Management of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: indication for different mobility management in 62 cases].[全膝关节置换术后僵硬的管理:62例不同活动度管理的指征]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Feb;89(1):27-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Manipulation under anesthesia: to do or not to do, that is the question.麻醉下手法治疗:做还是不做,这是个问题。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jul 15;93:682-683. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4344.
2
Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 145 patients.全膝关节置换术后麻醉下手法松解:145 例患者的回顾性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jun 21;93:583-587. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.3167.
3
Management of Stiffness following Total Knee Arthroplasty: International Survey on Surgeon Preferences.全膝关节置换术后僵硬的管理:关于外科医生偏好的国际调查
SICOT J. 2021;7:30. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021008. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Patients undergoing manipulation after total knee arthroplasty are at higher risk of revision within 2 years.接受全膝关节置换术后进行手法治疗的患者在 2 年内再次手术的风险更高。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Jan;32(1):145-150. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02943-z. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Manipulation under Anaesthesia for Patient Reported Stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population.亚洲人群全膝关节置换术后患者自述关节僵硬的麻醉下手法治疗
Malays Orthop J. 2020 Mar;14(1):55-60. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2003.009.
6
Manipulation under anesthesia as a therapy option for postoperative knee stiffness: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.麻醉下手法松解作为治疗术后膝关节僵硬的一种选择:一项回顾性配对分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jun;140(6):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03381-y. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
7
Efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia beyond three months following total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后三个月以上进行麻醉下手法治疗的疗效
Arthroplast Today. 2019 Oct 10;5(4):515-520. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.08.002. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Manipulation under anesthesia after primary knee arthroplasty in Sweden: incidence, patient characteristics and risk of revision.瑞典初次膝关节置换术后麻醉下手法复位:发生率、患者特征和翻修风险。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Oct;90(5):484-488. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1637177. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
9
Knee manipulation for reduced flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Is timing critical?全膝关节置换术后屈膝受限的膝关节手法治疗。时机至关重要吗?
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
10
Prognostic factors that predict failure of manipulation under anesthesia for the stiff total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.预测僵硬全膝关节置换术麻醉下手法治疗失败的预后因素:一项系统评价。
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):842-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.