Suppr超能文献

创伤后膝关节僵硬的麻醉下手法治疗——要点、陷阱及失败的危险因素

Manipulation under anesthesia for post traumatic stiff knee-pearls, pitfalls and risk factors for failure.

作者信息

Saini Pramod, Trikha Vivek

机构信息

Department of spine surgery, PD Hinduja Hospital, Mahim, Mumbai, 400016, India.

Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS, New Delhi, 110029, India.

出版信息

Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2315-2319. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stiffness is common following fractures around knee. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the initial noninvasive procedure usually performed for such patients. Though MUA has been extensively evaluated for knee arthroplasty, there is paucity of literature regarding its benefits in trauma cases. The purpose of this study was to define the role of manipulation in post traumatic stiff knees.

METHODS

Hospital inpatient and outpatient records from January 2010 to June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients undergoing MUA at our institution. Patients with more than one year follow up and adequate data were included. Clinical and radiographic parameters were analyzed to assess outcomes, complications, effect of timing on flexion gain as well as identify risk factors associated with failure.

RESULTS

Out of 45 patients undergoing manipulation, 41 patients with 48 knees (34 unilateral and 7 bilateral) met inclusion criteria. Thirty six manipulations were successful while 3 were abandoned due to tight tissues and 9 developed complications.Successful MUA resulted in immediate gain of 62.36° of flexion which decreased to 49.86° at 1year. There was statistically significant loss of flexion of 12.5° over a year (p value 0.0013). Arc of motion improved from 48.5° to 106.1° at 1year (p value <0.0001). Significant improvement was also seen in extension and fixed flexion deformity (p value <0.0001). No significant difference could be detected between early (<3 months) and late (>3 months) groups with respect to outcomes (p value 0.883)or complications (p value 0.3193). Failed group had significantly lower pre MUA flexion and pre MUA range of motion (p value 0.003). Univariate analysis showed that extensor mechanism ruptures during injury (p value <0.0001) and knees with Flexion <40° (p value 0.0022) or ROM<30° (p value 0.0002) were significantly associated with failures.

CONCLUSION

MUA is a suitable non invasive treatment option for post traumatic stiffness. There is no effect of timing on outcome and late manipulation also results in good outcome. Extensor mechanism rupture and pre manipulation ROM<30° or flexion <40° are associated with failure and such cases should be considered for alternative options for better outcome.

摘要

背景

膝关节周围骨折后僵硬很常见。麻醉下手法松解(MUA)是通常为此类患者实施的初始非侵入性操作。尽管MUA在膝关节置换术中已得到广泛评估,但关于其在创伤病例中的益处的文献却很少。本研究的目的是确定手法松解在创伤后膝关节僵硬中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2014年6月我院住院和门诊记录,以确定在我院接受MUA的患者。纳入随访超过一年且数据充分的患者。分析临床和影像学参数以评估结果、并发症、时间对屈曲增加的影响以及确定与失败相关的危险因素。

结果

在45例接受手法松解的患者中,41例患者的48个膝关节(34个单侧和7个双侧)符合纳入标准。36次手法松解成功,3次因组织过紧而放弃,9次出现并发症。成功的MUA使屈曲立即增加62.36°,在1年时降至49.86°。一年中屈曲度有统计学意义的下降12.5°(p值0.0013)。1年时活动弧从48.5°改善到106.1°(p值<0.0001)。伸直和固定屈曲畸形也有显著改善(p值<0.0001)。早期(<3个月)和晚期(>3个月)组在结果(p值0.883)或并发症(p值0.3193)方面未检测到显著差异。失败组的MUA前屈曲和MUA前活动范围显著更低(p值0.003)。单因素分析显示,受伤时伸肌机制断裂(p值<0.0001)以及屈曲<40°(p值0.0022)或活动度<30°(p值0.0002)的膝关节与失败显著相关。

结论

MUA是创伤后僵硬合适的非侵入性治疗选择。时间对结果没有影响,晚期手法松解也能取得良好结果。伸肌机制断裂以及手法松解前活动度<30°或屈曲<40°与失败相关,此类病例应考虑采用其他选择以获得更好的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验