• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过结构比对探索折叠分类的极限:利用已知折叠的诱饵进行大规模基准测试。

Exploring the limits of fold discrimination by structural alignment: a large scale benchmark using decoys of known fold.

机构信息

Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Comput Biol Chem. 2011 Jun;35(3):174-88. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.04.008
PMID:21704264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3145973/
Abstract

Protein structure comparison by pairwise alignment is commonly used to identify highly similar substructures in pairs of proteins and provide a measure of structural similarity based on the size and geometric similarity of the match. These scores are routinely applied in analyses of protein fold space under the assumption that high statistical significance is equivalent to a meaningful relationship, however the truth of this assumption has previously been difficult to test since there is a lack of automated methods which do not rely on the same underlying principles. As a resolution to this we present a method based on the use of topological descriptions of global protein structure, providing an independent means to assess the ability of structural alignment to maintain meaningful structural correspondances on a large scale. Using a large set of decoys of specified global fold we benchmark three widely used methods for structure comparison, SAP, TM-align and DALI, and test the degree to which this assumption is justified for these methods. Application of a topological edit distance measure to provide a scale of the degree of fold change shows that while there is a broad correlation between high structural alignment scores and low edit distances there remain many pairs of highly significant score which differ by core strand swaps and therefore are structurally different on a global level. Possible causes of this problem and its meaning for present assessments of protein fold space are discussed.

摘要

蛋白质结构比对通过两两比对常用于识别两个蛋白质之间高度相似的子结构,并基于匹配的大小和几何相似性提供结构相似性的度量。这些分数通常用于在蛋白质折叠空间的分析中应用,假设高统计显著性等同于有意义的关系,然而,由于缺乏不依赖于相同基本原理的自动化方法,这一假设的真实性以前很难测试。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于使用全局蛋白质结构的拓扑描述的方法,为评估结构比对在大规模上保持有意义的结构对应关系的能力提供了一种独立的方法。我们使用一组指定的全局折叠的大量诱饵来对三种广泛使用的结构比较方法(SAP、TM-align 和 DALI)进行基准测试,并测试这些方法对该假设的合理性程度。应用拓扑编辑距离度量来提供折叠变化程度的尺度表明,虽然高结构比对分数和低编辑距离之间存在广泛的相关性,但仍有许多对高度显著的分数差异核心链交换,因此在全局水平上结构不同。讨论了这个问题的可能原因及其对当前蛋白质折叠空间评估的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/6bdef1a0fac5/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/e9f2236a036c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/ca75f4f30698/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/4cb0847dd006/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/1f41a7c886e9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/f7e011c49c61/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/ed3f6fe20b46/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/affe6a83831e/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/6bdef1a0fac5/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/e9f2236a036c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/ca75f4f30698/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/4cb0847dd006/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/1f41a7c886e9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/f7e011c49c61/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/ed3f6fe20b46/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/affe6a83831e/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d7/3145973/6bdef1a0fac5/gr7.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the limits of fold discrimination by structural alignment: a large scale benchmark using decoys of known fold.通过结构比对探索折叠分类的极限:利用已知折叠的诱饵进行大规模基准测试。
Comput Biol Chem. 2011 Jun;35(3):174-88. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 13.
2
Automatic classification of protein structures using low-dimensional structure space mappings.利用低维结构空间映射对蛋白质结构进行自动分类。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-S2-S1. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
3
Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.用于自动评估蛋白质结构模板质量的评分函数。
Proteins. 2004 Dec 1;57(4):702-10. doi: 10.1002/prot.20264.
4
Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry.利用预测的局部结构进行折叠识别的隐马尔可夫模型:主链几何结构字母表
Proteins. 2003 Jun 1;51(4):504-14. doi: 10.1002/prot.10369.
5
Fr-TM-align: a new protein structural alignment method based on fragment alignments and the TM-score.Fr-TM-align:一种基于片段比对和TM分数的新型蛋白质结构比对方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 12;9:531. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-531.
6
Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores.评估基因组学中的注释转移:通过传统分数和概率分数量化蛋白质序列、结构与功能之间的关系。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Mar 17;297(1):233-49. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3550.
7
A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition.一种用于蛋白质折叠识别的机器学习信息检索方法。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;22(12):1456-63. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl102. Epub 2006 Mar 17.
8
DescFold: a web server for protein fold recognition.DescFold:用于蛋白质折叠识别的网络服务器。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 14;10:416. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-416.
9
DALI and the persistence of protein shape.DALI 与蛋白质构象的稳定性。
Protein Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):128-140. doi: 10.1002/pro.3749. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?蛋白质结构相似度 TM 值为 0.5 有多大意义?
Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 1;26(7):889-95. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Protein Fold Space.探索蛋白质折叠空间。
Biomolecules. 2020 Jan 27;10(2):193. doi: 10.3390/biom10020193.
2
DALI and the persistence of protein shape.DALI 与蛋白质构象的稳定性。
Protein Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):128-140. doi: 10.1002/pro.3749. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Molecular Models for the Core Components of the Flagellar Type-III Secretion Complex.鞭毛III型分泌复合体核心组件的分子模型

本文引用的文献

1
On the evolutionary origins of "Fold Space Continuity": a study of topological convergence and divergence in mixed alpha-beta domains.论“折叠空间连续性”的进化起源:混合 α-β 域中拓扑收敛和发散的研究。
J Struct Biol. 2010 Dec;172(3):244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
2
Re-evaluating the "rules" of protein topology.重新评估蛋白质拓扑结构的“规则”。
J Comput Biol. 2010 Oct;17(10):1371-84. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0265. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
3
How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0164047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164047. eCollection 2016.
4
Evolutionary inaccuracy of pairwise structural alignments.成对结构比对的进化不准确性。
Bioinformatics. 2012 May 1;28(9):1209-15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts103. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
5
Structural constraints on the covariance matrix derived from multiple aligned protein sequences.从多个对齐的蛋白质序列中得出的协方差矩阵的结构约束。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028265. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
6
Direct correlation analysis improves fold recognition.直接相关性分析提高了折叠识别能力。
Comput Biol Chem. 2011 Oct 12;35(5):323-32. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
蛋白质结构相似度 TM 值为 0.5 有多大意义?
Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 1;26(7):889-95. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
4
De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design.从头设计蛋白质的骨干支架。
Proteins. 2010 Apr;78(5):1311-25. doi: 10.1002/prot.22651.
5
The continuity of protein structure space is an intrinsic property of proteins.蛋白质结构空间的连续性是蛋白质的一种内在属性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15;106(37):15690-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907683106. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
6
Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies.具有不同整体拓扑结构的蛋白质之间的结构关系及其对功能注释策略的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 13;106(41):17377-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907971106. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
7
Probing the "dark matter" of protein fold space.探索蛋白质折叠空间的“暗物质”。
Structure. 2009 Sep 9;17(9):1244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.012.
8
Fold space unlimited.折叠空间无极限。
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Jun;19(3):312-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
9
Discrete-continuous duality of protein structure space.蛋白质结构空间的离散-连续对偶性。
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Jun;19(3):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 29.
10
Nothing about protein structure classification makes sense except in the light of evolution.除了从进化的角度来看,蛋白质结构分类的任何内容都毫无意义。
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Jun;19(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 24.