Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2526-33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182257520.
To assess whether the combination of daily evaluation and use of a spontaneous breathing test could shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation as compared with weaning based on our standard of care. Secondary outcome measures included extubation failure rate and the need for noninvasive ventilation.
A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Two pediatric intensive care units at university hospitals in Brazil.
The trial involved children between 28 days and 15 yrs of age who were receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hrs.
Patients were randomly assigned to one of two weaning protocols. In the test group, the children underwent a daily evaluation to check readiness for weaning with a spontaneous breathing test with 10 cm H2O pressure support and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O for 2 hrs. The spontaneous breathing test was repeated the next day for children who failed it. In the control group, weaning was performed according to standard care procedures.
A total of 294 eligible children were randomized, with 155 to the test group and 139 to the control group. The time to extubation was shorter in the test group, where the median mechanical ventilation duration was 3.5 days (95% confidence interval, 3.0 to 4.0) as compared to 4.7 days (95% confidence interval, 4.1 to 5.3) in the control group (p = .0127). This significant reduction in the mechanical ventilation duration for the intervention group was not associated with increased rates of extubation failure or noninvasive ventilation. It represents a 30% reduction in the risk of remaining on mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio: 0.70).
A daily evaluation to check readiness for weaning combined with a spontaneous breathing test reduced the mechanical ventilation duration for children on mechanical ventilation for >24 hrs, without increasing the extubation failure rate or the need for noninvasive ventilation.
评估与基于我们的常规护理的标准脱机相比,每日评估和使用自主呼吸试验的组合是否可以缩短机械通气的持续时间。次要结局指标包括拔管失败率和需要无创通气。
前瞻性、随机对照试验。
巴西两所大学医院的两个儿科重症监护病房。
该试验涉及接受机械通气至少 24 小时的 28 天至 15 岁的儿童。
患者被随机分配到两种脱机方案之一。在试验组中,儿童每天接受评估,使用 10cmH2O 压力支持和 5cmH2O 呼气末正压的自主呼吸试验检查脱机准备情况,持续 2 小时。如果儿童失败,第二天将重复自主呼吸试验。在对照组中,脱机根据标准护理程序进行。
共有 294 名符合条件的儿童被随机分组,其中 155 名进入试验组,139 名进入对照组。试验组的拔管时间更短,机械通气持续时间中位数为 3.5 天(95%置信区间,3.0 至 4.0),而对照组为 4.7 天(95%置信区间,4.1 至 5.3)(p=0.0127)。干预组机械通气时间的显著缩短与拔管失败率或无创通气率的增加无关。这代表着机械通气的风险降低了 30%(风险比:0.70)。
每日评估脱机准备情况并结合自主呼吸试验可缩短接受机械通气超过 24 小时的儿童的机械通气持续时间,而不会增加拔管失败率或需要无创通气。